The New Agency: closed

[Tammanae]

@Shame: In order to post an image, you simply grab the url for said image by right clicking it and selecting 'Copy Image Location', and then pasting this url to your post surrounded by the corresponding image code. For example, to place this image:



into my post, I right click it and gain the following url:

Code: Select all

http://www.iaza.com/work/111018C/iaza15681295020600.png

Then, to that url, I add the following:

Code: Select all

[img][/img]

This leaves me with the following code:

Code: Select all

[img]http://www.iaza.com/work/111018C/iaza15681295020600.png[/img]

This code is the one used to show the image in your post. ;3

I would also like to add that you may want to buff up your form a bit, as it is not up to the Agency's requirements as is.

[Darkest.Nation]

Frightful, I'm sorry, but we can't accept your first three designs as they were made with an animal maker. We don't accept those kind of design, as stated in the rules.

The last one is also off a maker from dA as well.

Although I understand that you don't accept "3-second-pets", if it's originally from a maker and kept as a charrie for a good amount of time, then why shouldn't it be donated?

[Tammanae]

Frightful, I'm sorry, but we can't accept your first three designs as they were made with an animal maker. We don't accept those kind of design, as stated in the rules.

The last one is also off a maker from dA as well.

Although I understand that you don't accept "3-second-pets", if it's originally from a maker and kept as a charrie for a good amount of time, then why shouldn't it be donated?

Because it is made with a maker. It is much easier for there to be a coincidence in which two people think of using the maker for the same design than it is for two people to randomly think of the same exact design when unaided by any means other than their imaginations. This can lead to trouble with claims of art theft from either character owner or even the owner of said maker, which we would rather avoid for both The Agency as well as the people who adopt.

[Mario]

Frightful, I'm sorry, but we can't accept your first three designs as they were made with an animal maker. We don't accept those kind of design, as stated in the rules.

The last one is also off a maker from dA as well.

Although I understand that you don't accept "3-second-pets", if it's originally from a maker and kept as a charrie for a good amount of time, then why shouldn't it be donated?

Because it is made with a maker. It is much easier for there to be a coincidence in which two people think of using the maker for the same design than it is for two people to randomly think of the same exact design when unaided by any means other than their imaginations. This can lead to trouble with claims of art theft from either character owner or even the owner of said maker, which we would rather avoid for both The Agency as well as the people who adopt.

Also, the last one wasn't from a maker. =_=

[neonfrozen]

Now now, lets not start a fight. /popsinrandomly

Im sorry if this is spam, but I would like too ask when the color changing weasel named tay will be up in the kennels? If she is, call me a retard.

[Tammanae]

Now now, lets not start a fight. /popsinrandomly

Im sorry if this is spam, but I would like too ask when the color changing weasel named tay will be up in the kennels? If she is, call me a retard.

No one is starting a fight... there is no need to mini mod, I have told you this many times before. I am merely explaining why we do not accept maker made characters as they had asked, simple as that.

As for your question, the staff will announce when the kennels are updated as always.

Also, the last one wasn't from a maker. =_=

The staff had not stated the last one was made from a maker, that was the donator who said so. I do not know who's word will be taken here as the staff had already discussed this and made a decision here and it had already been closed. I recognize the lines, and they are not from a maker, I am sure the others noticed too and this is why it wasn't ruled as a maker character.

If the donator is stating that it was made in a maker it may have simply had another ref originally, done in the maker, and then passed on to these lines? That is what I am assuming was meant?

[Mario]

Now now, lets not start a fight. /popsinrandomly

Im sorry if this is spam, but I would like too ask when the color changing weasel named tay will be up in the kennels? If she is, call me a retard.

No one is starting a fight... there is no need to mini mod, I have told you this many times before. I am merely explaining why we do not accept maker made characters as they had asked, simple as that.

As for your question, the staff will announce when the kennels are updated as always.

Also, the last one wasn't from a maker. =_=

The staff had not stated the last one was made from a maker, that was the donator who said so. I do not know who's word will be taken here as the staff had already discussed this and made a decision here and it had already been closed. I recognize the lines, and they are not from a maker, I am sure the others noticed too and this is why it wasn't ruled as a maker character.

If the donator is stating that it was made in a maker it may have simply had another ref originally, done in the maker, and then passed on to these lines? That is what I am assuming was meant?

Fly.With.Me isn't the donator. Frightful is.

[Tammanae]

Ah there we go, I completely confused the person posting for some reason when answering to you. XD In either case, as I had said, it had been decided by the staff that it was only the first three that were not allowed and the case had been closed, so it is irrelevant if another person says another design is from a maker without proof.

[Darkest.Nation]

My mistake guys, the last one's just a lineart. I'm just having a super good day.

http://arukardis.deviantart.com/art/Fre ... -214298876

[Tripp]

* pets everyone while stuffing his face with candy*

alright back on topic