jaxonlynx wrote:• hello! is this trade fair or overpay?
• i personally value uncommons the same no matter the date (same with omgsc-common) but, i know some people follow the 2:1 rule and i never want to make an unfair trade if the pet i'm offering on is more valuable than the ones i offered.
☆ (ex. 2017 uncommon = 2024 uncommon; 2016 omgsc = 2023 omgsc)
• so, I was curious to know if the 2:1 rule (ex. 2 2023 uncommons = 1 2013 uncommon) should apply because one of the pets are a 2013 uncommon?
• same question for the extremely common 2017 pet!
☆ (ex. 2 2023 extremely commons = 1 2017 extremely common)
• thank you in advance to anyone who might have an idea of how to go about this! thank you again! ^_^
• ☆ trade located here ☆
If you use the “2:1 rule”, then values double every year. So 1 ‘13 UC = 2 ‘14 UC = 4 ‘15 UC = 8 ‘16 UC, etc. I personally don’t recommend that method, because a pet’s rarity doesn’t actually double every year and most people don’t *actually* trade like that. Since the rarity update, some people have moved to a “3 year rule” where pets within 3 years can swap fairly.
If you use the 2:1 rule, then it’s VERY unfair to them. If you use the 3 year rule, there’s not a set rule about how much needs to be added for pets with a gap bigger than 3 years. It’s really up to you and your trading partner to determine what seems fair to you.
Personally, as someone who uses the 3 year rule, I’m on the fence. My first reaction was that your side feels a little high. But ‘13 vs ‘23 is quite a big gap, so I don’t know. A lot depends on how much you want the pets they’re offering.
.png)
.png)
