sweathie wrote:Working in tandem with mykola:
Spreadsheet of All Suggestions up to this point
I've gotten 2 banners while compiling this <3
please message me if you would like access to this doc as people are being incredibly immature
sweathie wrote:Working in tandem with mykola:
Spreadsheet of All Suggestions up to this point
I've gotten 2 banners while compiling this <3
pancreas. wrote:mods talk like theyre better than the users on here honestly. does anyone else get that vibe from them whenever they mssg you?
Lex. wrote:tavrosnitram wrote:boo, I’m back ! what if we had a MODERATOR made trading guide, which sets down basics of what should be something’s worth. sort of like setting down a basic skeleton of what things should be worth, not relying on other boards if this makes sense idk,,
They should give the real stats of the rarity groups.
All numbers of how many of a pet exist so rarity can be based on fact, with demand only being a fraction of a factor because people know that x many more are in circulation.
darkspawn wrote:tiredddd wrote:demisexual wrote:Thank you!! I actually love this doc! Could the owner of the thread add this to the main post? This would be helpful to have on there. :>
it has been added! ^^
Googles docs just got raided with some very derogatory stuff. 😐😐 lets be cautious about linking to other sites n stuff
Gadreel wrote:Lex. wrote:tavrosnitram wrote:boo, I’m back ! what if we had a MODERATOR made trading guide, which sets down basics of what should be something’s worth. sort of like setting down a basic skeleton of what things should be worth, not relying on other boards if this makes sense idk,,
They should give the real stats of the rarity groups.
All numbers of how many of a pet exist so rarity can be based on fact, with demand only being a fraction of a factor because people know that x many more are in circulation.
This is absolutely a good idea to implement to be able to know how many pets are actually available to adopt altogether for each pet and whether they're in the pound or many belong to a specific person (though that may be hard to show). On the other hand though this could also be used by people to hoard those certain low number pets to get extra money and bring up the pricing.
winx wrote:I have done it. I have officially read through all the pages up to this point, oop. There were a lot of different suggestions brought up within this thread, so I'll only touch on a few points from my perspective.
For those who do not understand the trading system in terms of Horror's list, I am always willing to help you! There are many players on here that frequent the "Is this a fair trade?" thread and the "How much is this pet worth?" thread that are knowledgeable on the subject as well if you're uncomfortable asking a green-named user like me. Just a few that I can name off the top of my head: Lex., keayi, angst, peanuts, BlueEyedKite, etc. No matter how large or small the ask is, I can and will help you. I personally really like Horror's list in comparison to the previous list that was in place. Horror's list is largely based off when a pet changes rarity or what a pets starting rarity was. I can go more in-depth in PMs if anyone is interested in the breakdown. Important to note that moderators and staff in general cannot enforce any trading guides. That would put too many restrictions on users.
If you have a bad interaction with a user while trading, please report it to us! We look into the situation and decide if any action needs to be taken. Bullying and harassment are not tolerated on CS. Additionally, block the user! That will make it so you don't accidentally send them another trade in the future or vice versa. The same can be said for scamming, though it is important to understand what scamming actually is. Scamming is when someone deliberately lies about what they are offering you. For example, if someone sends you a trade claiming their pet is worth more than it is or if someone claims your pet is worth less than it is, then that would be considered scamming.
On a completely different point, I would personally not like having to do daily tasks. I went on hiatus for almost four years during college. I came back to the website and it was like nothing had changed. I could pick up exactly where I left off. I've tried playing FR and other games with daily tasks, but my daily life is already too busy to be dealing with more daily tasks besides washing the dishes, doing laundry, and other random chores haha.
As for staff interaction, most, if not all of us, are on everyday. We let each other know if we're going to be inactive for periods of time. However, it is important to keep in mind that we are adults with different personalities and lifestyles. I, for example, work full-time from 8 AM to 4:30 PM, Monday-Friday. Despite all that, I still manage or try to spend at least 2 hours on CS a night. I'll even check it throughout the day when I take my breaks. For warnings, I agree that it can be difficult not knowing the "tone" of it. We're all sitting behind screens, just reading and interpreting messages to the best of our abilities, and that can lead to some upset feelings. I'm sure myself and other staff would agree (not to speak for anyone else, but just from what I've seen) that we never intend to hurt someone's feelings. We have a job to ensure the site's rules are being followed. Getting reprimanded for a simple mistake is not fun for anyone, but it is one of those things where it needs to be done to maintain the site. Even I have been sent PM reminders for accidentally breaking rules, so it can happen to anyone. Every rule in place has some kind of reason for it. If you're ever confused about a rule, please message a staff member or submit a ticket to get some clarification.
That's all my brain can remember at the moment. If I see my name tagged or this post quoted with a question, I'll try and answer as best as I can. Or better yet, just send me a PM. I care about ya'll. We're a community. Let's do our best for CS.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests