Mao mi wrote:kuroyami wrote:
but when people "can't take any more nonsense" and "everything is such a slovenly mess", it is only "correct" to call it illiterate. Illiterate, ignorant, foolish, messy, unpolished, uncivilized, inane, immature.
It's is one tiny step above complete lack of education, but the carelessness of it all allows one to safely label "illiterate". text that is hard to understand might as well be(or is it may as well?) be nonsense, and those who care not to read rules, or learn proper mechanics of the language "cannot read".
it is the kindest way to tell someone "you are a blithering idiot", kind like when you put a suffering "dog to sleep"
It's a matter of perspective and context.
In this particular case, it's not an insult here unless people start treating it like one.
Illiteracy doesn't necessarily mean you cannot read or write. It can extend to just not meeting up to certain standards, or simply not as refined. From what I can tell, people do not necessarily need perfect grammar to be understood, they just need to be coherent with their ideas.
I can understand chatspeak just fine for the most part, what starts to lose me is when topics start jumping mid-sentence. An example of "what the hell is this," would be something like this:
"I went to the park today the park is very nice and runned by the local city council I rather like the city council, the park was very full today, but I also sometimes think the city council isn't that great. There was someone walking their dog talking on the cellphone, there is a cellphone company that sells biscuits. I like the park, the park was fun."
^ Which is less grammar than it is sorting your thoughts out before you start posting.
Enfys wrote:What do you mean by 'script style'?
Enfys wrote:Ahh. So like:
CHARLES: Hey, what are you doing?
TALON: Nothing much.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests