M00N wrote:Bobkitty246 wrote:
TYPE OF QUESTION:math
YOUR QUESTION:![]()
Either I am not understanding this question the way it was supposed to be understood, and made things more difficult for myself, or I am just stupid ouo. I'd like to know your understandings for this question hehe! ^^" (its the first question on the page with the image next to it) sorry for the countless questions!
I think you're dealing with the Pythagorean theorem, no?
(a²+b²=c²)
in this case dougie is known to be in the center of the posts, and jon is at one end of an iso triangle, so the midline (jon to dougie) that divides the triangle forms two right triangles
now you plug in the lengths into the equation
it's been so long since doing this for me all I can think of is cos/tan/sine though?
It may be like
(3x²+x²=2.8²)
(4x²=2.8²) ect
so sorry guys ment to get to this sooner! college has been kicking my butt
THE PYTHAGOREAN THEOREM IS CORRECT!!!!!!
you just need to cut the triangle down the center, which is gives you the values for
I just want to say that this right here (the edit) is completely correct you just need to solve for x then plug in
take the square root of both sides to get rid of the power then do your simple math! <33
for how you solved, you used the info they gave you and the theorem
and for assumptions I say summarize the discussion I scrolled through otl
IF ANY OF THIS DOESNT MAKE SENSE PLEASE MESSAGE ME ILL CLEAR IT UP!!!!!!
A LOT OF THE CHAT HERE WAS GETTING WAY OUT THERE AND WAS A BIT CONFUSING TO DECIPHER DUE TO HOW IT WAS PRESENTED
THE PYTHAGOREAN THEOREM IS CORRECT!!!!!!
you just need to cut the triangle down the center, which is gives you the values for
I just want to say that this right here (the edit) is completely correct you just need to solve for x then plug in
take the square root of both sides to get rid of the power then do your simple math! <33
for how you solved, you used the info they gave you and the theorem
and for assumptions I say summarize the discussion I scrolled through otl
IF ANY OF THIS DOESNT MAKE SENSE PLEASE MESSAGE ME ILL CLEAR IT UP!!!!!!
A LOT OF THE CHAT HERE WAS GETTING WAY OUT THERE AND WAS A BIT CONFUSING TO DECIPHER DUE TO HOW IT WAS PRESENTED
Rabid_Jaguar wrote:Speardance wrote:
TYPE OF QUESTION: math
YOUR QUESTION:
so there's a function and I'm supposed to find the vertex of the parabola without graphing it.
the function is: f(x)=-(1/2x+1)^2+1
I know the vertex is the horz. shift and the vert. shift, but I'm unsure why the vertex is at (-2,1) and not (1,1)(using the horz. shift and vert. shift)
Could someone explain it to me really throughly how to solve it and why? Sorry if this seems really easy, I'm bad at math and I have a test on this tomorrow. e-e Thanks for any help!I'm unclear where it says that the vertex is (-2,1). Seeing this problem, this is what I think:
So the vertex form is y = a(x - h)^2 +k
The vertex of a function comes from the variables (-h,k). In your equation, h = 1 and k = 1. Therefore, your vertex would be (-1,1), since you take the opposite of the h term.
Bobkitty, I'm so sorry but I only ever did a couple of those types of problems, and that was several years ago. I'm not honestly sure how to solve that problem either. I would say to ask your friends about it, and if they can't help, ask your teacher. If the teacher is any good, he or she take the time to help you if you don't understand something.
EDIT: I think M00N is correct, the math looks right and that assumption can be made with the information given.
also want to throw in that this is correct you don't need the edit :)