Five nights at Freddy's Game Discussion

[Megaguirus]

Sorry if this post annoys anyone if they think it's obvious but....

If there were infact two bites ( 1987, 1983 ) then this means while one takes place in 1983, with Fredbear as the culprit, now I see alot of people asking WHERE the second one happened, well, let's revert back to 2014, when FNaF 2 came out. This one took place in 1987, something we all seem to have forgotten. This means Fredbear's Family Diner shut down within the span of 5 years in between the bites. Now it's probably safe to assume that it shut down around 1984-1985, with Freddy Fazbear's Pizza opening around 1986. Then after the 5th night on FNaF 2 we hear notice of a Party going on before the place shuts down, the day the second bite happens, with the most likely culprit being Mangle.
Well, this is what I think at least, sorry if it's vague

Yeah, but then why all the "Bite of '87" foreshadowing before the game came out? The only 1983 foreshadow we got was one tiny little source code. Please don't think of me trying to debunk your theory. I'm half wanting to believe it, because it does make sense. Especially when we take into account that Phone Guy says, in the first game, "Uh, they used to be allowed to walk around during the day too. But then there was The Bite of '87." Notice how he mentioned the free-roaming. This piece of evidence alone makes me want to believe that there were two bites.

But then again, we have a lot of evidence pointing towards it truly being the Bite of '87. So I don't know what to believe. I'm just confused, and I remember being completely dumbstruck when it was "revealed". It was so unexpected and made zero sense that I immediately made a theory around it. Yeah, it has a lot of holes, but a lot of it makes sense too.

Anyways, on another note, I, again, realized just how attached I've become to these games. I was listening to videos of all the sounds from the games, and I heard the night 5 phone call from FNaF1, and I remembered the whole internet flipping out about what it could mean and how to decode it. Good times.

I also got the feels when the good ending and bad ending music was played. As well as the music box songs for the various minigames. Makes it feel as if this game is older than it actually is. Weird.

[i<3 wolves678]

I just realized something the other day.
Original Bonnie is blue.
I thought this while looking at the image on Scott games that whist looking at every form of Bonnie, each of them seem to be somewhat blue, yet seem purple.
I mean, think about it.
All the toy animatronics except mangle and Toy Bonnie stayed the same colour, and we all know that many,es design was changed to be more "kid friendly", but why was toy Bonnie's colour changed?
Well, the answer is simple, it wasn't changed, yet it's just a lighter tone, and I think this might have been to show us that Bonnie is blue.
Whist looking at withered Bonnie and nightmare Bonnie, both seem more blue than purple to me, yet normal Bonnie seems more purple, but this might be to do with the fact that normal Bonnie is old.
I don't really know where I was going with this, but it's just something I thought.

[- ; bonk!]

Bonnie seemed to get bluer with every release. He started off purple in FNAF 1- some might argue he was blue, but I disagree because during the daytime he appears to be a lavendery purple. Withered Bonnie looked kind of indigo, and Nightmare Bonnie looks pretty blue.
I'm guessing it's just the lighting making Bonnie's color appear to change.

[i<3 wolves678]

Bonnie seemed to get bluer with every release. He started off purple in FNAF 1- some might argue he was blue, but I disagree because during the daytime he appears to be a lavendery purple. Withered Bonnie looked kind of indigo, and Nightmare Bonnie looks pretty blue.
I'm guessing it's just the lighting making Bonnie's color appear to change.

That's more likely what it is, but it still doesn't explain why toy Bonnie wasn't purple.

[Atomic Samurai]

Observing the image on Scott's website ( Without lighting ) I can see where you might vision them to be so. Though I do think that Bonnie from Fnaf 1 is definitely purple, whilst Withered Bonnie just looks slightly darker. And then Nightmare Bonnie does look somewhat blue, and more indigo.
Why Toy Bonnie is blue? It's simple. Think of what he would look like if he was purple, any shade. Got that picture? It's not very pretty in purple is it...

[- ; bonk!]

Sorry for minimodding, but Takeda, can you remove the image from Scott's website from your post, please? Since some younger users might find the animatronics scary, I believe it's technically against the rules to post the picture even though it doesn't have a jumpscare. ^^

[livsoccer02]

Yeah. Some versions of Bonnie look Blue and other Purple.

Also I'm surprised Scott has kept his word about the DLC release date so far.

[marston<3]

yay

[Bob Ross]

Does any ne else think that fnaf 4 isnt about the bite of eighty seven because the child actually dies and if you remember the first game phone guy says its amazing how the human body can
LIVE without the frontal lobe

[- ; bonk!]

Well, just because Phone Guy made a slight implication that the victim lived doesn't mean they did. He always could've lied. Or he could've just been stating a simple fact without meaning to imply the victim lived. It is a fact that people can live without their frontal lobe, so maybe he was just trying to change the subject to something a little more positive.