tawnypelt3 wrote:LissaJo wrote:River Blossom wrote:Was this fair?
No it was unfair to the shima side in rarity and demand.. shimas are going for mid to high advents demand wise at the moment
And i believe the swirl dog is an 08 as well so if you removed the shima and swirl dog from your side and one rare from their side, it would be fair (though the gsd does have a bit of demand)
It doesn't matter what Shima longtails are "going for." That is not an accurate measure of any demand for the pet, it's only what a few foolish people are paying and what many more people are demanding as payment.
The three 2nd gen dogs on the top side are all extended release pets that were available until late 2009, so they are only worth a late 2009 rare each. I don't know what you're saying, actually, as you seem to have the sides mixed up and I can't tell who you're saying it's unfair to.
☆ offsite adopts - watch me grow! ☆ 


BlackAdvent wrote:Wo7uld this be a fair trade? If not to who?
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... YzfrDtwpaw
Thank you in advanced
-Archer- wrote:
How much should they add?
☆ offsite adopts - watch me grow! ☆ 

Prussia. wrote:~*Snowfur*~ wrote:Fair? May I have two opinions?
Fair, the commons add up to two '11 rares, or one '10 rare. So both sides are equal to an '10 rare.
My math:
(2 commons = 1 uncommon)
(2 uncommons = 1 rare)
(2 rares = rare of earlier year)
senseless wrote:Would a Target Dog be fair for a Hyena demand-wise? Please base it on your opinion of their demand. Thanks ^^




senseless wrote:Would a Target Dog be fair for a Hyena demand-wise? Please base it on your opinion of their demand. Thanks ^^
☆ offsite adopts - watch me grow! ☆ 

Users browsing this forum: Dawulf, weegeestar5 and 1 guest