I am a traditional rater. However, I WILL bend the rules of it if needed. I also sometimes use North American traditionalism.
I usually use this system:
Nontraditional prefix or suffix: -5 points
Common name or bad flow: -1 point
Unrealistic pelt color: -3 points
Unrealistic prefix or suffix: -8 points
Glacialfrost: 0/10. You said nothing about her pelt color, and glacial means: "relating to, resulting from, or denoting the presence or agency of ice, especially in the form of glaciers." or "of ice; icy." Glacial- just does not work. -frost does represent a "frosty" cat, like said, but that's not a good trait. Suffixes represent good traits, not bad traits. Suffix suggestion: -whisker
Mousefoot: 5/10.[/b] A nice, simple name, all it brings to mind is a small brown cat. But -foot is misused; if he had excellent hunting, his suffix should be -whisker. (Unless you don't want to copy canon, in which -fang might work if he has good fighting as well as hunting. Suffix suggestion: -whisker
{name}: /10. {reasoning}
{name}: /10. {reasoning}
{name}: /10. {reasoning}
My cats
Shadefang: This cat has a black pelt.
Molly
This cat is admirably good at both hunting and fighting, but doesn't excel either way.
Godwitface: This cat has a gray-and-white pelt.
Tom
This cat is considered very good-looking, and has no skills or personality traits that fit neatly into a suffix.
Oatclaw: This cat has a golden-brown pelt.
Molly
This cat is highly adept in combat, and considered fierce and powerful on the battlefield.
Adderfoot: This cat has a brown tabby pelt.
Tom
This cat is a very capable runner, renowned for their speed and/or endurance.
Yellownose: This cat has a golden-colored pelt.
Molly
This cat is a markedly skillful tracker.