Decim wrote:I have a question, as I've seen a few around, but are characters that are literally animal forms of anime characters actually allowed, because isn't that like copyrighted material? ^^;;
like @Tyki-Pon's new character.. He's literally an animal form of Uta from Tokyo Ghoul
I hope I'm not offending anyone, but I'm just confused ono;;;
Well, for the most part it isn't copyright. Let's use Uta for an example (I hope you don't mind Tyki-Pon! OwO")
Uta, (I can assume) is a humanoid character with a humanoid clothes design.
In my opinion, the "design" for a human mostly comes from how their clothes were designed (and tattoos for the rare few) and the "design" for an animal character mostly comes from it's coat design (though there are characters who do were clothes as well).
Since this appears to be the average, humanoid and feral designs can barely be the same because there are two different type of designs to account for. Yumi's Uta doesn't have any of the clothes from Uta in the manga or anime so can we really call it Uta then? Yumi's character is mostly
inspired by the human Uta's design. In a public setting, unless you know Toykyo Ghoul really well most probably won't even know who it's based on.
A nice counter example would be with Pokemon Gijinkas. They are humanoid Adoptables based on Pokemon and their clothing designs are usually based on said Pokemon. The reason why they can be characters also because not only are Pokemon just tamable fighting companion creatures but their designs are usually really simple. If you were to make a human character after one there are many styles of clothing and designs to be able to convey that "hey, this humanoid is based off of Pikachu" and so forth.
The only limit I think you face is with having a character based off a character of the same species. Like a human Uta based off of the one in Toyko Ghoul or having a Pikachu that's a pikachu. This then becomes hard because said creators can use the copyright claim better since they now have the point of "it's similar to my character and the same species" because we character adopters use the same exact line when we are accusing others of art theft.
Of course you are free to use such characters on your own but I don't know of the consequences of using one in a public sphere.
Overall, it's your character so you are free to do what you want with. You can make inspired designs but not blatant copies (especially if they are the same species).
Add-ons:
Also, I agree with what King Xerberus says, but Squalo makes a very important point. If it I based or inspired off something me sure to give credit! Then at least people know who the character I based off of and there is no confusion.
Excuse me for writing so much. I just woke up and I didn't expect me to write so much at 5 am in the morning. XD
@everyone who viewed my characters Thanks for the feedback guys! I never knew there were so many you liked!