by The Lion Queen » Wed Apr 22, 2015 2:21 pm
I decided to bring up a discussion here
One thing that I see people use as a way to hand wave bad things in shows/books/games/whatever for kids is "oh it's for kids, you shouldn't expect it too be anything amazing". I really don't understand why people think that. Just because something is for kids doesn't suddenly mean that it being lazy and bad is excusable imo. There are plenty of things for kids that are good. I'm going to us a couple examples of other things for kids in comparison to warriors here, and for the record, the stuff I bring up I like, and Warriors is something that I don't like.
Okay. Warriors has really bad plots and characters [especially in the late books]. But just because it's for kids doesn't suddenly mean it has to have bad plots or characters. For example, Avatar is a kids show, and it had/has a great story and awesome characters. The reason why Warriors has bad plots and characters is because the writers can't write, not because it's for kids. The writers on Avatar actually COULD write, however.
Same goes with villains. Honestly, all of the villains in warriors are really cliché. Bu that's not because it's for kids. It' because the writers aren't very good at writing. I mean, ATLA was a kids show and it had good villains [especially Azula], and one of the characters who was the villain at first [you know who] ended up getting redeemed also, and said story arc was really good IMO
Also, MLP is a kids show, but it's villains aren't terrible. Look at Discord! If Warriors had a villain like that that would be awesome.
So anyway, my point is that warriors being a kids book series doesn't excuse it's bad characters, villains, and plots in general.
[but seriously though discord is awesome]
previously alexterri