The "Is This a Fair Trade?" Thread

My gallery · by **Snowy_Owl** » Thu Mar 05, 2015 7:44 am

PandaPowerLol wrote:
Snowy_Owl wrote:
Snowy_Owl wrote:
Can anyone help with this please? WWhat have to be removed/added?
Click

You're extremely overpaying

Thank you! What should I remove to make it fair?

My gallery · by **miyadera** » Thu Mar 05, 2015 7:47 am

Lightning ϟ Farron wrote:What should be added to make this fair?

My gallery · by **lodesh** » Thu Mar 05, 2015 7:48 am

lodesh wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=43845276&userid=367340&signature=JXwrm-EbJR2i4R0p521_Dg

fair?

My gallery · by **~ t r o u b l e ~** » Thu Mar 05, 2015 7:51 am

Lightning ϟ Farron wrote:
Lightning ϟ Farron wrote:What should be added to make this fair?

looks a bit unfair to them
The c$ shouldn't be needed as the two pets on your side would be fine for just the Aussie

lodesh wrote:
lodesh wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=43845276&userid=367340&signature=JXwrm-EbJR2i4R0p521_Dg

fair?

unfair to them
The punk is worth seven 09 rares or the two advents on their side should be fine

My gallery · by **Cattusorb** » Thu Mar 05, 2015 7:52 am

Magic_Machine wrote:Is this trade fair? With the rat being a 2009 I believe it does add up to about 3 2013 rares. It is also in the month of March in 2009 so it is worth a little bit more. From my prospective I added the 3 rares plus maybe an uncommon for the rat, the 2013 rare for 3 uncommons which is pretty fair. All in all I just really would like to know if it truly is fair. Thanks for the feedback.
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... D59JPAraAA

My gallery · by **bark!** » Thu Mar 05, 2015 7:53 am

Lightning ϟ Farron wrote:
Lightning ϟ Farron wrote:What should be added to make this fair?

In my opinion, it's fair to both sides as it is. The late 2009 re-release covers the store pet, and 15 c$ is about what a (late) 2010 rare is worth according to the 'how much is this pet worth in c$' thread So, maybe a hair (tiny) bit unfair on your side. However, the demand of the aussie, comes into play as well

My gallery · by **musicgurl333** » Thu Mar 05, 2015 8:03 am

✪ F l y - F r e e ✪ wrote:
Lightning ϟ Farron wrote:
Lightning ϟ Farron wrote:What should be added to make this fair?

In my opinion, it's fair to both sides as it is. The late 2009 re-release covers the store pet, and 15 c$ is about what a (late) 2010 rare is worth according to the 'how much is this pet worth in c$' thread So, maybe a hair (tiny) bit unfair on your side. However, the demand of the aussie, comes into play as well

I disagree. It's definitely unfair to the top, not the bottom. The aussie is an early '09, not a late one. The store pet on the bottom is needed to make up for the difference in dates between the zodiac dog and the aussie. The C$ isn't needed.

My gallery · by **honee bee** » Thu Mar 05, 2015 8:33 am

fair or unfair and to who? thanks!

My gallery · by **Cattusorb** » Thu Mar 05, 2015 8:34 am

The Writer wrote:fair or unfair and to who? thanks!

Still a little unfair to the top, but it is adding up with the others. Get a second opinion.

My gallery · by **_Cat~Eye_** » Thu Mar 05, 2015 8:42 am

Is this fair ? Thanks:3
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... pkw_rXbVNg

The "Is This a Fair Trade?" Thread

Re: The "Is This a Fair Trade?" Thread

Re: The "Is This a Fair Trade?" Thread

Re: The "Is This a Fair Trade?" Thread

Re: The "Is This a Fair Trade?" Thread

Re: The "Is This a Fair Trade?" Thread

Re: The "Is This a Fair Trade?" Thread

Re: The "Is This a Fair Trade?" Thread

Re: The "Is This a Fair Trade?" Thread

Re: The "Is This a Fair Trade?" Thread

Re: The "Is This a Fair Trade?" Thread

Who is online