ShortyTheHobbitess wrote:@Totakeke
I get a little prickly when people start talking about the halter division of QHs. THOSE poor beasts are intentionally breed to look like that, their even trained & if I remember right, fed to add even more useless muscle bulk. I think I've read somewhere that a lot of them aren't ridable, seems silly since that's what most people like to be able to do with their horses. I get prickly about them because some people seem to think that's what real QHs look like, that's untrue though, real quarters can actually do things. While the breed norm is to have large e.i. powerful hindquarters & good muscle in general, the halters are in my opinion, grotesquely shaped & muscled. I'm sure everyone has their opinions on halter style horses, I personally wish they hadn't become popular >.<
Off my high horse about halters now... I really wanted to ride a week ago when it was 45 F out, but the 'arena' would've been slippery & the yard was either a slogging mud pit or a sheet of ice, it might've been fine in the pastures, but again no way of knowing if someplaces would be slick or squishy & soggy.
-
-
-







Totakeke wrote:Found this on fuglyhorses and I'm curious: do y'all think this horse can even run with that hind end? Those post legs and well everything else just screams unhealthy. I can't find a single picture or video of this poor stallion moving and honestly I want to know what it'd look like compared to say... Good ol' Gunner
Confo sure has gone downhill these past 10 years; most Quarter Horses are starting to look more like sickly cows than lovely equines :c/rantover


Looking for:
You know, you don't throw
a whole life away, just 'cause they're
a little banged up.
~ Tom Smith, Seabiscuit
-
-
-
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests