

Inska wrote:They did go for UR aussies, but tend to go for lower at the moment.
But even if you value it at an UR aussie, the gap is only a non and a '09 UR dog.
broccoli_guardian wrote:Does the bottom side have to edit? If yes, how much? Uncommons or newer rares?
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... 8H1_W4sqjQ
DuckGoesRawr wrote:broccoli_guardian wrote:Does the bottom side have to edit? If yes, how much? Uncommons or newer rares?
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... 8H1_W4sqjQ
It's unfair to them, you need to add though I'm not sure exactly what.
cheeryarver wrote:hello c:
I was wondering if this trade is fair?
thank you for any help~!
crystal5117 wrote:cheeryarver wrote:hello c:
I was wondering if this trade is fair?
thank you for any help~!
Unfair to them. The store items are completely free, and anyone could get them. I'm not sure why they need them, but that doesn't matter.
The dogs should be worth more than the items, though, since the items are one of those things that are like "get-this-item set-for-free-but-only-get-them-once" thing. The entire set won't make up for it, either. The set has very low demand, and although you can only get the set once, they're completely useless.
I'd rather let you get a second opinion though, since I'm not too sure though.


♡ Nyrα ♡ wrote:Would this be fair?
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... nWmRmDAZTg
If not what should be added?
broccoli_guardian wrote:DuckGoesRawr wrote:broccoli_guardian wrote:Does the bottom side have to edit? If yes, how much? Uncommons or newer rares?
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... 8H1_W4sqjQ
It's unfair to them, you need to add though I'm not sure exactly what.
Thank you. Second opinion or more advice?
Users browsing this forum: Firstarfan20, TANKMEN and 0 guests