Ω E q u i n e ˩σʌɛяΩ wrote:
Anyone?
Unfair to them by alot.
The '13 GuPPS is only worth an early '12 uncommon (= 2-year-rule), so the late '11 uncommon would be a slight, but nice overpay.
Ω E q u i n e ˩σʌɛяΩ wrote:
Anyone?
xXToffeeXx wrote:What about this?
If it isn't fair what would need to be added or taken away from what side?
Thanks
Miika19129 wrote:Which is a better bid? (For the first 1 pretend the newborn dog on my side isn't there. Its just a COPPA phrase.)
This 1:
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... s42VkPchMg
Or this 1?:
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... AfOCnwv9lw
Miika19129 wrote:Which is a better bid? (For the first 1 pretend the newborn dog on my side isn't there. Its just a COPPA phrase.)
This 1:
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... s42VkPchMg
Or this 1?:
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... AfOCnwv9lw
hatredfox- wrote:Miika19129 wrote:Which is a better bid? (For the first 1 pretend the newborn dog on my side isn't there. Its just a COPPA phrase.)
This 1:
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... s42VkPchMg
Or this 1?:
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... AfOCnwv9lw
Definitely the second trade, just one of the rares on their side would be overpay for your dog already.
rocky121001 wrote:Miika19129 wrote:Which is a better bid? (For the first 1 pretend the newborn dog on my side isn't there. Its just a COPPA phrase.)
This 1:
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... s42VkPchMg
Or this 1?:
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... AfOCnwv9lw
I belive the second one is better c: Get a second opinion please
Users browsing this forum: Minimanta, Plumcheekswillywoo and 12 guests