WASSAP wrote:Question. With demand so high on certain pets, shouldn't the list reflect that? I mean demand influences trades alot. And if there simply is more demand than there is supply, the higher price commonly paid and overall value on the pet should reflect this. I just think the chart doesn't factor demand enough. Or that the opposition to demand is so great as to undervalue some pets. People still state you can buy a advent for 70-80 c$ or a few 09 rares. But almost no one would ask for such a low amount when they can get double, triple, or much much more.
DaDwarf wrote:Don't forget that fair trades still happen. Yes, some pets go for overpay. There was a time when BA's went almost exclusively for sorbets. But now? From what i've seen, not anymore. We don't want demand to influence trading more then it already does ;3 People reapply demand enough, the list shouldn't reflect that.
WASSAP wrote:So why hasn't the Shima longtail been on the bottom of the advent list? Its traded for consistently more and for many months above the bottom. Even now finding one at a modest price is a challenge. What about the August pps? Despite the drop in the demand, it is still a consistently hard to get and trade for pet. I just feel the list should follow the market ar least bi-monthly. And just as people come to resent overpay, having a pet higher on the list may actually quell demand. As well as giving new players a more real time look at a pets trade value.
I am a holibomber!Navigation wrote:
redbing0 wrote:If demand was factored into the list anymore it would only increase demand. There are people who will trade fairly as the list says, if the list is changed constantly to feed demand 1. Many trades will be deemed unfair because they are still trading to last months standards, for example, also where a pet gets ranked highly people are more likely to go 'oh that's really high and worth this much if they want it that bad they won't mind paying more' and it carries on and on and on until demand makes everything miles more expensive than it should be.
Demand is already in the list in many ways, if it was rarity alone the ice rats would be up there in the September list (or so I presume considering release date), however they have no demand, not many people want them so they aren't.
WASSAP wrote:
If demand was factored into the list anymore it would only increase demand. There are people who will trade fairly as the list says, if the list is changed constantly to feed demand 1. Many trades will be deemed unfair because they are still trading to last months standards, for example, also where a pet gets ranked highly people are more likely to go 'oh that's really high and
WASSAP wrote:So why hasn't the Shima longtail been on the bottom of the advent list? Its traded for consistently more and for many months above the bottom. Even now finding one at a modest price is a challenge. What about the August pps? Despite the drop in the demand, it is still a consistently hard to get and trade for pet. I just feel the list should follow the market at least more closely. Say bi-monthly or monthly if possible. And just as people come to resent overpay, having a pet higher on the list may actually quell demand. As well as giving new players a more real time look at a pets trade value.
Users browsing this forum: .*Rose*., FawnaPastel, Porgie, Wookieinmashoo and 11 guests