The Biblomaniac Army (booklovers, UNITE!) v.2

[Anathomy]

i have seen the movies and read the book as usual the movies got stuff wrong but the books sort of bored me (but then again i bore esily)

me too. i usally just stick to the percy jackson books and what ever rick riordan writes hehe

[Optimistic Kitten]

i have seen the movies and read the book as usual the movies got stuff wrong but the books sort of bored me (but then again i bore esily)

me too. i usally just stick to the percy jackson books and what ever rick riordan writes hehe

personally, I think Percy Jackson is getting a little old. kind of like warriors.

[Anathomy]

i have seen the movies and read the book as usual the movies got stuff wrong but the books sort of bored me (but then again i bore esily)

me too. i usally just stick to the percy jackson books and what ever rick riordan writes hehe

personally, I think Percy Jackson is getting a little old. kind of like warriors.

i know i thought so too, but then the writer made a new serie with more (new) characters so it's a bit more action in it now.

[Roonil Wazlib]

@Optimistic Kitten
Yeah, I used to LOVE those books, and then after reading them all three times they got really boring. I dunno, but I tried to read them a fourth time but I couldn't make it through the first book :/

@Pony
If you like Percy Jackson, I'm sure you'd like Harry Potter. A lot of people find the first chapter or two of the first Harry Potter book boring, but I didn't find it boring (then again, that's just me). Just stick to it and it gets really good.
I think I read them first in fourth grade but I've re-read them all a ton of times.

[Dexter's Gal]

@ Pony: Hmm, I'd have to disagree with you on the new series. I think it's kinda lame compared to the original one (except for any parts with Leo). I prefer the older ones much more.

& @ Optimistic Kitten: Yes, it is getting a little old. And, i do like Warriors, but it started getting old at the third series. Unfortunately, that's also when it got weird and kind of boring.

[The Growling Wolf]

I've never read warroirs, but i probbaly should....
But I coutned books I've got too read ( not including ones I can borrow off mum) I have just under 50!

[Roonil Wazlib]

I've never read warroirs, but i probbaly should....
But I coutned books I've got too read ( not including ones I can borrow off mum) I have just under 50!

Wow! That'll take some time to get through xD Good luck!

Has anyone read the Name of the Wind? I've been thinking about reading it.

[.:Alaska Young:.]

i really love any thing by Rick Riordan but harry potter sort of board me
my friends love warriors so i read the first one and really didn't like it was that just me or do they get better like rangers apprentice

[Dexter's Gal]

In my opinion, if you didn't like the first one (Into the Wild), then you probably won't like the rest.

[glassea]

{ the original percy jackson series was good for me, because it had a set ending. i greatly respect author who know when to end a story--or go on, and in my opinion, ruin it completely and totally. warriors stretched on for far too long before

SPOILER ALERT
firestar finally died. ohmigod why couldn't he have kicked the bucket a little earlier?

i also didn't like ranger's apprentice that much by the end. at that point

SPOILER ALERT
the title was inaccurate because he was no longer an apprentice.

so yes, i generally do not like series with no set conclusion, but love those whose authors have the guts to kill off characters and not write five million hundred sequels. it just gets very annoying when you're like, this was a good book! but now i have to wait two years to read the next one! and by that point you forget everything that's happened and yeah.

sorry. rant.