Trade Rant Thread V.23

[Weiss Schnee]

Oh man.

[Dragonborn Comes]

BABAEBTSRGEBGDBG
BLACK ADVENT, YOUR NOT WORTH MY TOXIC -face palms BA-

[Gigglebug]

"the 2 brown dogs are 08 releases feel free to edit"

...Except they aren't. Look at their adoption dates: 2009-01-26, 2009-02-16

Actually they are sort of right: they were released in August of 2008, see here: http://www.chickensmoothie.com/archive/2008/August/

So technically they are 2008 dogs. They were just available some time that is why the dates can reach into 2009

Still that trade does not look fair at all...

[J4 Coltrain]

where are all the bunnies? I just want one before the Easter craze gets here. D: People are always clamoring over each other for the bunnies during that time and demand skyrockets.

[dreamscape.]

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... CJ0pX06M6A
Rare=very rare /endsarcasm
Not to mention the bunny is a high advent

post above me, I have lots of advent list bunnies of you're interested

[Noel]

"the 2 brown dogs are 08 releases feel free to edit"

...Except they aren't. Look at their adoption dates: 2009-01-26, 2009-02-16

Actually they are sort of right: they were released in August of 2008, see here: http://www.chickensmoothie.com/archive/2008/August/

So technically they are 2008 dogs. They were just available some time that is why the dates can reach into 2009

Still that trade does not look fair at all...

Huh, I guess they had a bit of a point, but nonetheless those particular two were adopted in '09. '<_<
And it's still not fair either way.

Also, this trade. Their username bothered me a lot too, it seemed pretty egotistic on my tradepage but obviously I can't say what it was. >_>

[Gigglebug]

"the 2 brown dogs are 08 releases feel free to edit"

...Except they aren't. Look at their adoption dates: 2009-01-26, 2009-02-16

Actually they are sort of right: they were released in August of 2008, see here: http://www.chickensmoothie.com/archive/2008/August/

So technically they are 2008 dogs. They were just available some time that is why the dates can reach into 2009

Still that trade does not look fair at all...

Huh, I guess they had a bit of a point, but nonetheless those particular two were adopted in '09. '<_<
And it's still not fair either way.

Also, this trade. Their username bothered me a lot too, it seemed pretty egotistic on my tradepage but obviously I can't say what it was. >_>

I think they are technically viewd as 08 dogs though for the release date. I mean you need to fix a date somewhere. And if truedate = rerelease then any different adoption datzes of a pet should be the same.

But I agree it's still unfair, I just wanted to point out that those dogs were indeed 08 dogs

[Erythro]

One rule in giant red letters.

[cherrystarluv]

One rule in giant red letters.

You don't want the UR butterfly? I'd accept that in a heartbeat. But I guess I can understand that they didn't read your rules.

Anyway, if people only trade like 2013 doubles, they're going to get a lot of one sided trades saying "what would you offer on my pet?"

Come on people! What's the fun in that!

[Erythro]

One rule in giant red letters.

You don't want the UR butterfly? I'd accept that in a heartbeat. But I guess I can understand that they didn't read your rules.

Anyway, if people only trade like 2013 doubles, they're going to get a lot of one sided trades saying "what would you offer on my pet?"

Come on people! What's the fun in that!

The UR bwolfs is impossible to trade. I only want dogs because dogs are the easiest to trade.