Someones rules wrote:Rule 1. Ask for my items without offering me a terrific trade and I will foe you in an instant
*
*
Rule 4. My 2011 pets is worth 4 uncommon pets of 2012. A 2010 pet is worth 6 uncommon pets, and a 2009 is worth 8.
I guess with Rule 4, demand wouldn't mean anything to them? also not too keen on rarity math..
someones trade rules wrote:I am '_____' a mighty beast, and the protector of '_____' break her rules and suffer my wrath, my master will NOT trade unknown rarities unless you overpay. if you offer a trade on her growing pets she will cancel without hesitation! she is only looking for wishlist pets...
It was longer then that but the point is, rules writing out in a story, having to read through paragraphs to find the rules, just annoys me.
Is it me or do people all work the math out differently? A seperate person's rarity math had the OMG so rare = 8 rare... the reason the rarity math annoys me is the demand, I don't know what pets have demand but I know it ups their vaule quite a lot, or in some cases may drops the vaule? so the rarity math wouldn't apply correctly and the trade would be unfairsomeones trade rules wrote:5) I so my pet trades like math
OMG so common = 1
Common = 2
Uncommon = 3
Rare = 4
OMG so rare = 5
Both or these require me copying their trades rules and putting them into a word document to change the colour or size so I can read them
•Trade rules writing in a colour that makes them near impossible to read
•Trade rules in a tiny text
Rant on trade groups:
When there is no trade or doubles group, all pets have the wishlist lock, and the trade rules say 'Only trading pets I have doubles of!' .. well that won't be time comsumming at all..
When peoples Pet groups are written like: ♣ΣMΣПƬΛ► :I know its their preference but I can't read them and I don't know what pets I'm suppose to offer on.
Sorry for the long post ^^'
.png)
.jpg)
.png)
.png)
