~Amberleaf~ wrote:I sort of believe in God in this way: ^.^; "The Bible has many morals, and it makes sense, and I believe that. If there's something after death, great. If there's nothing, then, well, too bad, but what's the harm in believing there is?" I believe in God, but not necessarily about the afterlife/reincarnation. ^.^;
Seasonal <3 wrote:It annoys me when your treacher passes something out, skips you, then asks why you don't have it done. >.>
Bullet wrote:@ Lynx - I can't even get myself behind the wheel XD My family has been pushing for me to get a permit, but I so don't want to.
Liongirl Mew wrote:One thing that bugs me is science. I consider it a religion because the definition of religion is a way to describe the world around us. And thats what science does. Sure there's proof but there's proof of religion too. And what we are learning are just theories. Not necessarily fact. Why should I waste time learning a theory that won't help me much in life. Why can't they teach us about like illnesses we should know about and stuff like that. I don't care how the earth was formed. And then when I ask about why we have to learn it I get the teacher telling my dad he thinks I'm disrupting class and trying to waste time when he even says its a good question.



Liongirl Mew wrote:One thing that bugs me is science. I consider it a religion because the definition of religion is a way to describe the world around us. And thats what science does. Sure there's proof but there's proof of religion too. And what we are learning are just theories. Not necessarily fact. Why should I waste time learning a theory that won't help me much in life. Why can't they teach us about like illnesses we should know about and stuff like that. I don't care how the earth was formed. And then when I ask about why we have to learn it I get the teacher telling my dad he thinks I'm disrupting class and trying to waste time when he even says its a good question.
In other words, while there is a possibility that it's inaccurate in some manner, it's the best explanation we have to work with at the time, it holds true most or all of the time, it is demonstrable and testable, and it not only explains but predicts things that happen with reasonable accuracy. People outside of the scientific field always get this one wrong and think the word 'theory' in the scientific sense (e.g. theory of gravity, theories of physics, theories of mathematics, etc) means the same as 'theory' in the common sense, which is "an assumption based on limited information or knowledge; a conjecture." Scientific theories are higher than facts - they're the underlying principles behind the facts. It's a fact that an apple will always fall downward if released in the air. The theory shows that it isn't actually falling but being pulled, that everything is always being pulled in the same manner, that the strength of the pull is measurable and calculable for all things, and that objects will never 'fall' upward or sideways, only down. Learning these things isn't important if you don't intend to get any form of higher education, but if you want to go on to any university, you have to know at least the basics, and they do also pop up in unexpected places in practical life - for example, theories of physics play major roles in music, and dogs do calculus in their heads while fetching a tennis ball or frisbee. Mostly though, when you learn about those things it gives you the ability to think and reason things out instead of just shrugging and saying "I dunno; who cares?" when someone asks why something is. If nothing else, I've found it's a great way to get little kids to stop asking "Why? Why? Why?!" about everything when you can explain it in full detail so there are no more questions left for them to ask about it. XDA set of statements or principles devised to explain a group of facts or phenomena, especially one that has been repeatedly tested or is widely accepted and can be used to make predictions about natural phenomena.


Atwood wrote:Liongirl Mew wrote:One thing that bugs me is science. I consider it a religion because the definition of religion is a way to describe the world around us. And thats what science does. Sure there's proof but there's proof of religion too. And what we are learning are just theories. Not necessarily fact. Why should I waste time learning a theory that won't help me much in life. Why can't they teach us about like illnesses we should know about and stuff like that. I don't care how the earth was formed. And then when I ask about why we have to learn it I get the teacher telling my dad he thinks I'm disrupting class and trying to waste time when he even says its a good question.
The definition of theory:In other words, while there is a possibility that it's inaccurate in some manner, it's the best explanation we have to work with at the time, it holds true most or all of the time, it is demonstrable and testable, and it not only explains but predicts things that happen with reasonable accuracy. People outside of the scientific field always get this one wrong and think the word 'theory' in the scientific sense (e.g. theory of gravity, theories of physics, theories of mathematics, etc) means the same as 'theory' in the common sense, which is "an assumption based on limited information or knowledge; a conjecture." Scientific theories are higher than facts - they're the underlying principles behind the facts. It's a fact that an apple will always fall downward if released in the air. The theory shows that it isn't actually falling but being pulled, that everything is always being pulled in the same manner, that the strength of the pull is measurable and calculable for all things, and that objects will never 'fall' upward or sideways, only down. Learning these things isn't important if you don't intend to get any form of higher education, but if you want to go on to any university, you have to know at least the basics, and they do also pop up in unexpected places in practical life - for example, theories of physics play major roles in music, and dogs do calculus in their heads while fetching a tennis ball or frisbee. Mostly though, when you learn about those things it gives you the ability to think and reason things out instead of just shrugging and saying "I dunno; who cares?" when someone asks why something is. If nothing else, I've found it's a great way to get little kids to stop asking "Why? Why? Why?!" about everything when you can explain it in full detail so there are no more questions left for them to ask about it. XDA set of statements or principles devised to explain a group of facts or phenomena, especially one that has been repeatedly tested or is widely accepted and can be used to make predictions about natural phenomena.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest