nightowl21 wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=21901362&userid=83525&signature=E3MWam3Vk4wTFpDelj7jLw
Is this fair?
C.S. Lewis wrote:You can never get a cup of tea large enough, or a book long enough to suit me.
♥Psych♥ wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=21896849&userid=237883&signature=axwPaGZCXrkcVONshYV5OQ
Is that fair?
~•MidnightDreamer•~ wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=21901979&userid=297372&signature=TmtdhMLeVSxQ1dsmk1lcNw
Would this be a good trade up? I'd like to know if I should accept it with demand and without.
C.S. Lewis wrote:You can never get a cup of tea large enough, or a book long enough to suit me.
The Apothecary wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=21887462&userid=78983&signature=1dJRYyctfXRnVckFrE-fzQ
Is this fair? ^^

















Umbrellas wrote:~•MidnightDreamer•~ wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=21901979&userid=297372&signature=TmtdhMLeVSxQ1dsmk1lcNw
Would this be a good trade up? I'd like to know if I should accept it with demand and without.
I'd take it. For one it's unfair to them, and secondly none of those pets have very good demand. The Seal Store dogs have okay demand, but Grinners definitely do not, and I don't think the Christmas tree dog does either.
Agent Washington wrote:Considering demand and rarity, which of the two would be a better deal for the UR Dog?
Red Toxic for '09 UR Dog
or
Yellow Sorbet for '09 UR Dog
I know the sorbet is a few lines higher than the toxic but sorbets have bad demand, and toxics have fairly decent demand but I want to be sure ^^.
The Apothecary wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=21887462&userid=78983&signature=1dJRYyctfXRnVckFrE-fzQ
Is this fair? ^^

















Users browsing this forum: Nicnova, SonrienteMuerte, Susiron and 0 guests