BeaEmily wrote:Eruru wrote:Rumakiel wrote:It is true that there is no risk of them becoming extinct anywhere in the near future, but it could be possible if people were very strict about spaying/neutering and only breeding "special" cats for generation after generation.
No, I don't think that feral, or otherwise "moggies" should be bred either. But, I don't think that it must be a case of a cat or dog being greatly above standard to be bred. I think that even if an average pet owner acquires a cat that is essentially of excellent show quality; that does not make them qualified to breed it.
I think that only responsible breeders should breed pets. It should never be just somebody who happens to have two excellent "quality" animals on their hands. It should always be somebody who understands the breed, understands the health of breed, has their pets health tested and knows the health history of the ancestors of the pets as well, is financially able to not just care for the pets but be able to afford anything that could possibly go wrong, questionnaires the new owners , and is prepared to take back any pets if their new homes don't work out.
In short; that is not your average pet owner.
XD Well obviously. I kind of thought that that went without saying. Of COURSE only decent breeders who really know what they're doing and have all the time and resources to be able to do it should breed. That's the first rule of breeding ethics. I was just talking about which cats should be bred, not who does the breeding.
Not going to start a war, But I personally don't think there is a such thing as a 'responsible breeder' Look at all the purebreds that end up in shelters, Both my cat and my dog are rescues and I've never owned a pet from a breeder, They breed for the money
Cutting in real quick. A common misconception is that all breeders breed for money. While 500 for a cute kitten seems like a lot (certainly more than I'm willing to pay for a common cat), there are extensive health tests which are not cheap, veterinary care for the kittens and parents which is not cheap, travel costs and show fees which certainly add up, and then you also have stud fees to pay. Then all the kittens are chipped, vaccinated, claws trimmed, and come home with a free sample of the breeder's food and a handmade care guide. I don't recall if cat registries require a fee to become a member and register each cat, but they probably do, and if you're going to a reputable breeder you're getting papers, registration, AND everything I just mentioned. Suddenly $500 seems like a bargain because that's thousands of dollars the breeder is dumping into a single litter... which may turn out to only produce one or two kittens! If kittens cost roughly $400 for their first couple months of care, the breeder already spent most of that $500 on vet care
per kitten alone. The rest goes toward the health tests for parents, travel costs, show fees, stud fees... Reputable breeders are usually
losing money. As someone said, reputable rescues and breeders are places that seem to be purposely trying to put themselves out of business.
Purebred cats actually very rarely end up in shelters. In the cat fancy, you are only purebred if you have papers. There might be cats that appear to be purebred, like dollface persians, however most of them lack that papers required to actually call them purebreds and thus they are considered nothing more than moggies. The papered purebreds are usually snatched up right away as well, leaving the moggies and the appearing-purebreds (aka BYB purebreds) in shelters. It's mostly the same with dogs too- actually well bred dogs from reputable breeders very rarely end up in shelters. You see mostly byb/puppymill purebreds and mutts there.