



b-star wrote:They are both immensly unfair to you, unless i've missed something ^^
The first trade could use about two sorbets and a low toxic or so.
The second would need at least a little more than two sorbets - Get another opinion on this though.
Solloby wrote:b-star wrote:They are both immensly unfair to you, unless i've missed something ^^
The first trade could use about two sorbets and a low toxic or so.
The second would need at least a little more than two sorbets - Get another opinion on this though.
I'd cancel both, neither offer enough to be worth considering. If the other person thinks that's ok to offer then they have no clue about the value of the pet they are asking for and probably won't agree to quadrupling their offer (which would still be unfair to you).






QueenTess wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=20313083&userid=14276&signature=mBh383A6tSFDva_aYPUMGg
Hello! Is this fair?
lieutenant diesel wrote:Solloby wrote:b-star wrote:They are both immensly unfair to you, unless i've missed something ^^
The first trade could use about two sorbets and a low toxic or so.
The second would need at least a little more than two sorbets - Get another opinion on this though.
I'd cancel both, neither offer enough to be worth considering. If the other person thinks that's ok to offer then they have no clue about the value of the pet they are asking for and probably won't agree to quadrupling their offer (which would still be unfair to you).Okay, so I'll admit that I sent one of those trades. But it's for a quantity auction. Immortal is asking how many advents and rares we need to add, not sorbets or toxics or anything.
I'm very happy to add to my bid, and I'm definitely going to, but Immortal is asking for feedback so she can advise us on what we need to add.
Sorry for being a bit snappy, but this happened earlier, too D: Thats why Immortal specified advents and rares, not main list or Septembers.
lieutenant diesel wrote:Solloby wrote:b-star wrote:They are both immensly unfair to you, unless i've missed something ^^
The first trade could use about two sorbets and a low toxic or so.
The second would need at least a little more than two sorbets - Get another opinion on this though.
I'd cancel both, neither offer enough to be worth considering. If the other person thinks that's ok to offer then they have no clue about the value of the pet they are asking for and probably won't agree to quadrupling their offer (which would still be unfair to you).Okay, so I'll admit that I sent one of those trades. But it's for a quantity auction. Immortal is asking how many advents and rares we need to add, not sorbets or toxics or anything.
I'm very happy to add to my bid, and I'm definitely going to, but Immortal is asking for feedback so she can advise us on what we need to add.
Sorry for being a bit snappy, but this happened earlier, too D: Thats why Immortal specified advents and rares, not main list or Septembers.
QueenTess wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=20313083&userid=14276&signature=mBh383A6tSFDva_aYPUMGg
Hello! Is this fair?
I m m o r t a l wrote:lieutenant diesel wrote:Solloby wrote:I'd cancel both, neither offer enough to be worth considering. If the other person thinks that's ok to offer then they have no clue about the value of the pet they are asking for and probably won't agree to quadrupling their offer (which would still be unfair to you).Okay, so I'll admit that I sent one of those trades. But it's for a quantity auction. Immortal is asking how many advents and rares we need to add, not sorbets or toxics or anything.
I'm very happy to add to my bid, and I'm definitely going to, but Immortal is asking for feedback so she can advise us on what we need to add.
Sorry for being a bit snappy, but this happened earlier, too D: Thats why Immortal specified advents and rares, not main list or Septembers.oh i'm so sorry guys! i forgot to add the part about the quantity.
and i have another one to rate.
THIS IS FOR A QUANTITY ADVENT LIST PET AUCTION. don't want people to miss that.
so, out of these three bids, which one is a. the best and b. how many advent list pets should be added to make it fair? i need advice on all three, so that the bidders have something to go on.
trade one - trade two - trade three
Solloby wrote:Unless I counted incorrectly (or made an error with the maths, see above for the figures):
Trade 1 is worth about 25 Advents.
Trade 2 is worth about 10/11 Advents.
Trade 3 is worth about 28 Advents.
Your Nonswirl is worth 100 - 165 Advents, seek advice on which calculation for it is most correct (or if I made another error early on, as you can see errors carry very heavily). I would ask for confirmation of the Nonswirl's Advent value before working out what they need to add. But I think Trade 3 is the best, especailly as the balloon dog is a lot easier to trade off than the speckle rat.




Mystic Flight wrote:I don't know if this belongs here, but which pet has more demand: a dogtag or a moonswirl? Would it be a wise move to trade my dogtag for a moonswirl? (Of course if I added some of my pets, I was just wondering if it would be a wise move demand wise.)
Thank you in advance ^^
b-star wrote:Solloby wrote:Unless I counted incorrectly (or made an error with the maths, see above for the figures):
Trade 1 is worth about 25 Advents.
Trade 2 is worth about 10/11 Advents.
Trade 3 is worth about 28 Advents.
Your Nonswirl is worth 100 - 165 Advents, seek advice on which calculation for it is most correct (or if I made another error early on, as you can see errors carry very heavily). I would ask for confirmation of the Nonswirl's Advent value before working out what they need to add. But I think Trade 3 is the best, especailly as the balloon dog is a lot easier to trade off than the speckle rat.I agree, the third trade is the best out of the far, but still quite a far way from the worth of the non.
I would actually say the non is worth about 100-140 high advents/110-155 mid-advents or 140-170 Advents ^^
Though we need a very experienced mass trader to share some thoughts on it :3
Users browsing this forum: demifiend, dwarjam, Nicnova, Sunabi, ᴍᴀᴏᴄɪғᴇʀ and 1 guest