We've updated our pet rarity measurements!

[one single bee]

But anyway, c'mon guys, afford it, the admins aren't going to return the "uncommons", just let the time pass and you will love this change, hehe, but I love the blue when the rarity is OMG So common, but the red is a little...

[SydneyandStorm]

You are free to say what you think, yes, but us users who are getting frustrated are becoming so because of how sad all of this is. Tess and Nick work so incredibly hard to make this work, so hard that they can't even enjoy it like the rest of it. I mean, think of it! When was the last time you saw them just posting for fun and integrating with everyone else? This is a huge, hard project for them to keep going and it's almost mean for you to criticize them over a system that will only make it fairer. While we've all lost pets with high rarities - even Tess and Nick! They own pets too! - everyone who hates this needs to just calm down and realize how hard it must have been to recode a system that has been in place since the beginning of CS.

So thank you so much, Tess and Nick, for making this possible and working so hard on this awesome site. And as I've said before, I really like this new system! <3

[Oliverstorm]

You are free to say what you think, yes, but us users who are getting frustrated are becoming so because of how sad all of this is. Tess and Nick work so incredibly hard to make this work, so hard that they can't even enjoy it like the rest of it. I mean, think of it! When was the last time you saw them just posting for fun and integrating with everyone else? This is a huge, hard project for them to keep going and it's almost mean for you to criticize them over a system that will only make it fairer. While we've all lost pets with high rarities - even Tess and Nick! They own pets too! - everyone who hates this needs to just calm down and realize how hard it must have been to recode a system that has been in place since the beginning of CS.

So thank you so much, Tess and Nick, for making this possible and working so hard on this awesome site. And as I've said before, I really like this new system! <3

THANK YOU.

This is what I've been trying to say ^^ Everyone's pets went down, so its all the same, just new tags.

[one single bee]

Thinking of it, yes, you have reason, we are just blind about our own things, guys please think of all this, Tess and Nick too loosed their "uncommon" pets and another rarities

I love all this, thanks Nick, thanks Tess, I got all the messages and thank you CS community ★‹3★

[Squishy Fishy]

guys, stop it.

This change must have taken EXTREMELY long to develop, and your just like "my uncommon's turned common I hate it!"

can't you have a sliver of gratitude that Tess and Nick care about us and want to make CS fun?

[nickjr]

Not to mention that it seems like an awful lot of people place a "good" or "bad" label on this change solely based on how only their own pets changed rarities. Not everyone does this, I know, but I've been seeing a LOT of "oh hey, this is a good change! my uncommon turned very rare and I didn't have to do anything! thanks nick!" and "omg this is a horrible change my rare turned uncommon"...

oh, and a lot of people seemed to have no read the first post all the way through xD some people did and still didn't like the change (for whatever reason) but a LOT of people went "ohhhhhh I see" after someone quoted the "your rares were never really rare!" portion of the first post. Nick had it bolded and colored from the start, and still people didn't read the first post. I should be mad about that, but instead, I am greatly amused

[swoomzie]

guys, stop it.

This change must have taken EXTREMELY long to develop, and your just like "my uncommon's turned common I hate it!"

can't you have a sliver of gratitude that Tess and Nick care about us and want to make CS fun?

I do <3 I think these rarities are great! Thanks Nick and Tess!

[Kitty6561]

But, shouldn't there be less Uncommons than there are commons? Uncommons should be... well... more uncommon.

[moonlightfox]

This makes much more sense, thanks Nick^^

[Hoof]

But, shouldn't there be less Uncommons than there are commons? Uncommons should be... well... more uncommon.

With this new system there are more commins than commons. Before, almost every current outcome was uncommon, if not rare.