Announcements about events or changes to the website and forum
by supernovacity » Sat Aug 11, 2012 9:23 am
Nick wrote:We've removed the rarities for August for the moment, because unlike regular months we have lions this month which are likely to change in numbers a lot over the month :)
Thank you. I hope the munchkins stay nice and common though <3 I'd love to have more <3
Won't waste more tears on yesteryears───════════════◈════════════───

nova - she/he/they
icon - pixels───════════════◈════════════───
Instead we'll carry on
-

supernovacity
-
- Posts: 6902
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 11:58 am
- My pets
- My items
- My wishlist
- My gallery
- My scenes
- My dressups
- Trade with me
by Simplistic Beauty » Sat Aug 11, 2012 9:24 am
Tam I am wrote:Do we really need the term 'OMG'? It's kind of offensive to some people, you know.
I'm pretty sure I've seen OMGSR said to be Oh My Gosh.
******************************
My name is Simplistic Beauty.
Just a girl who enjoys
the simpler things in life
and a heart for adventure.
I'm always open to talking
to new people so don't be afraid
to send me a pm and have a nice day!
******************************
-

Simplistic Beauty
-
- Posts: 16071
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:17 pm
- My pets
- My items
- My wishlist
- My gallery
- My scenes
- My dressups
- Trade with me
by Brooketail » Sat Aug 11, 2012 9:27 am
Sabatea wrote:I do have one question though... I noticed somewhere it said that older users who had the pets were still being counted as having them and therefore altering the old rarities. It was mentioned that the rarity was going up because of that. Why would it go up when there was more of them? Wouldn't that make it go down? I'm sorry if I am misunderstanding or if it was simply a mistake that they made ^-^
Well think about it, Sabatea. They counted the people, but knew they were inactive so they didn't really count them. So they are still high on the list.
I hope that clears something up for you!
-

Brooketail
-
- Posts: 14272
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 2:43 pm
- My pets
- My items
- My wishlist
- My gallery
- My scenes
- My dressups
- Trade with me
by puffins » Sat Aug 11, 2012 9:31 am
Hekomi wrote:~Mystic~ wrote:Tam I am wrote:Do we really need the term 'OMG'? It's kind of offensive to some people, you know.
I'm pretty sure I've seen OMGSR said to be Oh My Gosh.
Yes, it's Oh My Gosh.
That's how I read it.
no longer use this website.
-

puffins
-
- Posts: 25208
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2011 8:02 am
- My pets
- My items
- My wishlist
- My gallery
- My scenes
- My dressups
- Trade with me
by Sabatea » Sat Aug 11, 2012 9:32 am
Brooketail wrote:Sabatea wrote:I do have one question though... I noticed somewhere it said that older users who had the pets were still being counted as having them and therefore altering the old rarities. It was mentioned that the rarity was going up because of that. Why would it go up when there was more of them? Wouldn't that make it go down? I'm sorry if I am misunderstanding or if it was simply a mistake that they made ^-^
Well think about it, Sabatea. They counted the people, but knew they were inactive so they didn't really count them. So they are still high on the list.
I hope that clears something up for you!
Not exactly what I meant xD I was speaking more of before. Say, we have a rare dog. We have 300 users that have it but are inactive for whatever reason. So, the users that have it and are active are trading it and such, so a year or so later, how would these 300 or so users there make the rarity of the pet higher? I'm sorry if I'm still not getting it xD If I'm not please just tell me and I'll spend longer reasoning it over

Last edited by
Sabatea on Sat Aug 11, 2012 9:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
XXXXXX「
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX」
Maplestar image ©
Chimerect
-

Sabatea
-
- Posts: 39897
- Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 12:08 pm
- My pets
- My items
- My wishlist
- My gallery
- My scenes
- My dressups
- Trade with me
by Hoof » Sat Aug 11, 2012 9:33 am
Red_Cat_Artist wrote:;n; crap....this stinks.
no rares were changed....THAT TIS A LIE!!!! >.< Tons of rares were changed to uncommons.
That's because they weren't really rare in the first place.
Last edited by
Hoof on Sat Aug 11, 2012 9:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
-

Hoof
-
- Posts: 6178
- Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 5:23 pm
- My pets
- My items
- My wishlist
- My gallery
- My scenes
- My dressups
- Trade with me
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests