"The" Rares List Guide - Do not ask about new UR's!

[DaDwarf]

Question:Do you think The spotted Tribal will ever jump up to the next level of rare list pets? Or is the big gap so much that it would be impossible?

That gap is really big, and the demand for a spot is really low. So imo no.

[MovedintoOwlsaccount]

This is just a personal opinion and question.
So far everyone i traded with had the rareslist rats on their wishlist.
However nobody would trade for their worth.
Don't you think the rats, like on the september list should be moved down a space or two?

[Pideaux]

This is just a personal opinion and question.
So far everyone i traded with had the rareslist rats on their wishlist.
However nobody would trade for their worth.
Don't you think the rats, like on the september list should be moved down a space or two?

The rats are far rarer than their placement suggests. They are already moved down the list because their demand is so low. :3 - I personally don't want to trade for rats until I've completed the rest of my collection simply because other pets are harder to find and all my fodder would be gulped up by rats that I could easily find months from now as well. :3

[MovedintoOwlsaccount]

This is just a personal opinion and question.
So far everyone i traded with had the rareslist rats on their wishlist.
However nobody would trade for their worth.
Don't you think the rats, like on the september list should be moved down a space or two?

The rats are far rarer than their placement suggests. They are already moved down the list because their demand is so low. :3 - I personally don't want to trade for rats until I've completed the rest of my collection simply because other pets are harder to find and all my fodder would be gulped up by rats that I could easily find months from now as well. :3

Oh D:
Well then, i feel stupid v_v
Why must the rats be so low in demand? D:

[Cellar x Elijah]

This is just a personal opinion and question.
So far everyone i traded with had the rareslist rats on their wishlist.
However nobody would trade for their worth.
Don't you think the rats, like on the september list should be moved down a space or two?

The rats are far rarer than their placement suggests. They are already moved down the list because their demand is so low. :3 - I personally don't want to trade for rats until I've completed the rest of my collection simply because other pets are harder to find and all my fodder would be gulped up by rats that I could easily find months from now as well. :3

Oh D:
Well then, i feel stupid v_v
Why must the rats be so low in demand? D:

I've never understood this myself. The lineart is adorable and most of the designs are spectactular, so I don't understand what makes them so unwanted. :c I actually personally don't understand how things like July rats aren't on the rares list just for their rarity alone. In my mind, they should be like the Apple. As far as I've seen, the only reason the Apple's even on the list is because of what it is, a UR...but it's demand is absolutely terrible, like seriously. I never see hardly anyone wanting the Apple, and from what I've seen, it's demand is even worse than the rats. Not to mention that some of those July rats that aren't on the list -have- to be more rare than the Apple. I just don't understand it. How can something like the apple have terrible demand, worse than at lease some of those rats at least, and still be on the list purely because of what it is and its "rarity" but most of those July rats get shoved down to the Septembers list "because of demand" when their rarity alone should place them on at least the low rares list, like the Apple.

It's just something that's been bugging me for quite a while now and I know for a fact that I'm not the only one who has thought about this in a similar way. ;n; I understand the fact that this list takes both rarity and demand into account...that's exactly why the BA is only on the September list. It's rarity holds it down from going any higher on the list, whether demand says it should go higher or not. But it should also be the other way around, in my opinion. Some things get held below certain points on the list because of how low their rarity actually is but some things should also be held above certain points on the list because of how rare they actually are, despite demand. If we can move things like the BA up to the Septembers list because demand holds it higher than the rest of its litter, then rarity should be able to do the same thing...

~ElijahWilkes

[Hekomi]

If it's just a rare, and not VR, it's probably not on the list. ^^;

[crescent + cheep]

If it's just a rare, and not VR, it's probably not on the list. ^^;

Are there any rares on the List at all?

[DaDwarf]

If it's just a rare, and not VR, it's probably not on the list. ^^;

Are there any rares on the List at all?

I believe the scarf dogs are still rare (Grown white and blue) I'm not 100% sure though. Aside from those, no. Rares are just not rare enough ^^.

[Tybalt]

If it's just a rare, and not VR, it's probably not on the list. ^^;

Are there any rares on the List at all?

I believe the scarf dogs are still rare (Grown white and blue) I'm not 100% sure though. Aside from those, no. Rares are just not rare enough ^^.

They are still rare, both types just passed through my account, and I checked.

As Cat says below though, the PPS is a VR and on the september list.

[MovedintoOwlsaccount]

I think the grow white scarf dogs had to be on the list and haden't a choice.
They were an advent, so they needed to be onto the list.
However the PPS scarf dog is a september list and a VR ^^