Discussion about the Pets, Items, Dress-ups, Events, Site, Forum or other CS features!
by Raire » Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:51 am
Brolga wrote:New rare.

Technically, it's not
new. This pet came out this month and this thread is for Rarity
changes 
But yes, many people talked about this dog and wondered what rarity was possible.
Last edited by
Raire on Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:52 am, edited 2 times in total.
-

Raire
- Global Moderator
-
- Posts: 17816
- Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2009 9:00 am
- My pets
- My items
- My wishlist
- My gallery
- My scenes
- My dressups
- Trade with me
by Raire » Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:53 am
Discord wrote:Assigning rarity tags to new pets is a vital part of rarity changes/updates and worthy of being discussed here.
I didn't meant it as "it doesn't belong here", I already edited my post to clarify that.
What irked me was the word "new" in that post.
-

Raire
- Global Moderator
-
- Posts: 17816
- Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2009 9:00 am
- My pets
- My items
- My wishlist
- My gallery
- My scenes
- My dressups
- Trade with me
by Hekomi » Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:57 am
Raire wrote:Discord wrote:Assigning rarity tags to new pets is a vital part of rarity changes/updates and worthy of being discussed here.
I didn't meant it as "it doesn't belong here", I already edited my post to clarify that.
What irked me was the word "new" in that post.
o_o How does that irk you? It just got it's rarity tag... before that it was unknown. So it is a "new" rare.
-

Hekomi
-
- Posts: 25059
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:30 am
- My pets
- My items
- My wishlist
- My gallery
- My scenes
- My dressups
- Trade with me
by contra » Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:59 am
Hekomi wrote:Raire wrote:Discord wrote:Assigning rarity tags to new pets is a vital part of rarity changes/updates and worthy of being discussed here.
I didn't meant it as "it doesn't belong here", I already edited my post to clarify that.
What irked me was the word "new" in that post.
o_o How does that irk you? It just got it's rarity tag... before that it was unknown. So it is a "new" rare.
Yeah, the person said New
rare. Not new pet.
It is new in the group of rares c:
i'm a tulip in a cup // i stand no chance of growing up
-

contra
-
- Posts: 3334
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 12:28 pm
- My pets
- My items
- My wishlist
- My gallery
- My scenes
- My dressups
- Trade with me
by Raire » Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:59 am
Hekomi wrote:o_o How does that irk you? It just got it's rarity tag... before that it was unknown. So it is a "new" rare.
'cause to me it doesn't sound like "it just got a rarity", but "oh it's changed and is now a new rare".
Maybe it's just me, because where I live it's unusual to say "new" in such a case.
@Lake
Yep, I understood that and that's not the point / what I meant ^^;
Actually, I expected the Sunback bunnies to be uncommon as well as the Vixens, because they were the most popular ones. (Though I DID expect the Timberbunny to be uncommon, to...)
-

Raire
- Global Moderator
-
- Posts: 17816
- Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2009 9:00 am
- My pets
- My items
- My wishlist
- My gallery
- My scenes
- My dressups
- Trade with me
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: 90days, TANKMEN, Zopix, ᴍᴀᴏᴄɪғᴇʀ and 6 guests