Ostwyn wrote:Dogs and cats both also need some other materials in their food than pure meat
This is absolutely untrue, and to be fair, it wounds me a bit to see false information so widely spread. At least when it comes to cats: domestic cats -- well, every member of the Felidae family -- are
obligate carnivores, meaning that they
only need to eat meat to survive and whilst Taurine is very important for a cat to thrive, this is an organic acid found... in ANIMAL TISSUE (so you see how it doesn't conflict with exclusive raw feeding). Which is why competent (resourceful) raw feeders know to add tissue and offal to their animals diets (raw skin, heart, liver, tripe, etc.)
I'm not as well versed on canine nutrition, so I can't shed much light on it.
As for the salmonella issue, I raw feed my two cats and have never had a problem with it. I also keep reptiles (as you do, correct?) and they are (
estimated of 92% snakes) passive carriers for the salmonella bacteria. In my opinion, you're more at risk from contracting the disease by handling a reptile than by feeding raw food to your pets.