Trade Rant Thread. {new rule please look}

[BlingBling]

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=12413697&userid=148774&signature=GeAnU5cOM0lRDal-7fiSUQ

I'm not in the mood for this, just really not in the mood

[SnowStar]

The trade doesn't really bother me, but the message does.
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... X8zsxqZ6dw

i also want ur joke dog so can u send me a trade that shaow what u want for it thank-you for your time

Say what? Didn't you even try to read my trading rules? Ugh, I wish people would take the time to read sometimes. -headtodesk-

[kaypatts]

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... d=12421643

ugg

[♥ ♥ ♥]

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=12421643

ugg

can't see it. c:

[rickith]

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... 3BdfMuiCLA

Hm…

[*destiny*]

Ugh! I sent this:

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... EtIY2fjv4w

They edited to this

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... 9duoGUliAQ

and they then they sent me this message:

"The dog is from 2010. And I offered that one because a butterfly wolf is worth more than a dog."

The dog is a re-release from 2009. And since when has a butterwolf been worth more than a dog unless it is a special!!!!

[hotel breakfast]

From an '09 user with the message: "deal?"
I was shocked that anyone would send a trade like this, so I checked their rules. Rarity math. -_-
We've gotten lots of trades liked this lately. We won't over pay for owls. We would if we had a very rare hoard, but owls aren't valued highly. We'll trade fairly for them, but we are most certainly not trading our '08 rares for them.

['Possum]

From an '09 user with the message: "deal?"
I was shocked that anyone would send a trade like this, so I checked their rules. Rarity math. -_-
We've gotten lots of trades liked this lately. We won't over pay for owls. We would if we had a very rare hoard, but owls aren't valued highly. We'll trade fairly for them, but we are most certainly not trading our '08 rares for them.

That is absolutely enraging.
I can't stand those rarity equations. So annoying! D:

[עורב לבן]

I really dislike when people send a trade that is empty on my side and expect me to offer for it. Pick something you want, for heaven's sake! We can work it out from there. I even have it in my rules, but then someone sends me a blank on my side trade for the current angel staff dog outcome. I already have one, so I am really only posting the staff outcomes I like so people missing the ones I have can do a swap.

I politely let them know that, and they tell me they have all the outcomes too, and trail off with "so...". So WHAT?! WHAT do you expect me to do with that? I already told you I am not overpaying. Then they edit the trade to send me the angel dog and an uncommon 2010 pony asking for my Warrior Cat. It clearly says in my rules that Warrior Cats are for overpay only, and why would I want a pony I already have for a Warrior Cat, anyway? The angel dog does not make up the wide berth in value difference. Just no.

This is why I usually just cancel trades that are blank on my side. Blank on their side I am okay with if it is a suggestion and they want me to look and see if I want anything. Blank on their side means they are fishing for offers. Hold a freaking auction if you want best offer.

[Mythicwave]

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=12422083&userid=152860&signature=Lw_HDgVMuwJ43BdfMuiCLA

Hm…

Not extremely rage worthy (At least to me), but I wouldn't accept it. More likely than not, the PPS is going to be uncommon, and you're probably going to get better trades than that for it.