Alsatian-Lover wrote:I think it's extra sad when people shoot wolves for preying on their livestock.
That not sad. Thats justice.
Alsatian-Lover wrote:I think it's extra sad when people shoot wolves for preying on their livestock.
horse_lover0726 wrote:I get that... what i mean is if there is absolutely NO deer at all in the forest(or wherever) and a wolf kills livestock, why should it get punished if it's never done it in years passed... If hunters kill all of the food(no matter what they'd rather have) why should the wolves be punished... Sure, i agree that if a wolf keeps killing your herds, it should get punished, but if the wolf has NO other choices, they shouldnt be killed.. if you were a starving(like, to death) kid and you saw a pie sitting in a windowsill, unwatched, would you keep walking and starve to death, or take a bite?(bad comparison... but thats all i got)
Red wrote:Call me Red, Scarlett or Scar. :)
Scorpio born in the year of the Tiger.
horse_lover0726 wrote:If it's the first time they ate the sheep, they wouldn't know to associate eating sheep as a bad thing... and maybe it's humans that are driving them out... you're starting to sound like you WANT the wolves killed... you didnt quote the other person's full thing... if humans chop down the forests and drive the prey (and the wolves) from their homes, what else are they supposed to eat... i get that they could move on, but if they see animals(no matter what) they'd think they could stay and eat that, even if there werent deers... I think they should just be relocated, not shot... but apparently you think wolves should be killed it they step out of line, even if it's just once and they dont know any better... : /
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests