Kalika Kai wrote:"Would you consider this to be a fair trade?"
Oh yes, my fifteen 2011 pets for your thirteen 2011 pets. Oh that is so fair. ;-; [/endsarcasum]
None of those pets are my hoards; so I don't really want them; not to mention I, personally, value cats more than dogs because I like the cats more. And there's no way I'm going to overpay for pets that are just going to end up in my trades. ;-;
So I canceled with this message:13 of your pets that I don't even want for 15 of mine from the same year?
Yeah no; not fair. Same year trades are usually same rarity=same rarity. I don't need to pay 15 pets to get 13 I already have and don't want from the same year...
Might be a bit bad, but I had just gotten another annoying trade and I was a bit miffed.
"Might you be willing to do this as a trade then? I'm sorry about the trade earlier, generally people value dogs more than cats so I figured it should stack up as fair. But hopefully you'll class this as fair? The dog I'm offering is 4 months older and the same rarity..."
I just told you I don't want that dog; so WHY are you offering it to me again??
And I don't care if it's 4months older; I don't WANT it. >.>
So I canceled, told them that, and they send me this trade: "This then? I didn't realize that even if I made an over offer you wouldn't accept." and they cancel it before I could accept it.
I send them this PM:Just because you think you're over offering doesn't mean you'll get the pet you want.
ESPECIALLY when you offer a pet that the person specifically told you they already have and don't want. >.>
I didn't think I was being that rude; but then they go and send me this PM back:Okay, okay, I didn't realize that when someone has a pet in their TRADE groups that's barely worth anything on their wishlist that accepting a trade that was offering a pet worth MORE was a bad idea.
Apparently I don't know anything though. Now I know why I don't trade, because people have this lovely habit of getting grumpy over almost nothing.
I really don't actually see why you PMed me anyway.
I PMed them to let them know that "overpaying" with a pet that someone's already told you that they DON'T want isn't going to get you the pet that YOU want. *Grumbles*
People like this are why I don't want to trade. ;-;
And they're from October 2009

9: DO NOT complain about pets that are not for trade here. It will be counted as spam and is frowned upon. If you are getting trades for pets that are not for trade or prized highly LOCK THE GROUP. There is no reason to complain here when such a problem has a very easy solution.
August<3 wrote:9: DO NOT complain about pets that are not for trade here. It will be counted as spam and is frowned upon. If you are getting trades for pets that are not for trade or prized highly LOCK THE GROUP. There is no reason to complain here when such a problem has a very easy solution.



Kalika Kai wrote:@Pideaux--> For what? The fact that I value cats more than dogs?? I'm ranting about the fact that they sent me another trade offering a pet that I told them already I didn't want...
Reese's wrote:That I cant get a good trade for this dragon
Hope this is okay. Edit if not. Thanks in advance.

aibo7m3 wrote:Kalika Kai wrote:@Pideaux--> For what? The fact that I value cats more than dogs?? I'm ranting about the fact that they sent me another trade offering a pet that I told them already I didn't want...
Actually if I am correct you never told them that you didn't want the specific pet that they offered in the third trade, or did you just mean you didn't want non-wishlist pets?
Kalika Kai wrote:13 of your pets that I don't even want for 15 of mine from the same year?
Yeah no; not fair. Same year trades are usually same rarity=same rarity. I don't need to pay 15 pets to get 13 I already have and don't want from the same year...



Users browsing this forum: TANKMEN and 0 guests