laurenrock wrote:I believe they deserve to be free. Yes, their population numbers need to be controlled. But when they are important to their habitats. Just look at Yellowstone National Park. After all of the wolves were removed/killed populations of other species were eventually undermined. Look what's happened now that they're back. Population numbers are back up. The ecosystem is thriving instead of suffering. If you do not believe me, look it up
Flareon wrote:Wolves in general? Or grey wolves?
Greys used to be my favorite animal, until I met wolfaboos. It may sound mean and unfair to wolves, but, sorry that's just how it happened. I am (still) a wolf lover whom supports regulated hunting, conservation through zoos/parks, and etc of grey wolves. But it gets tiring being told why wolves are SO much better than every other animal on Earth. Do I still like greys? Yes. Do they need help: No, put your efforts on animals who are going to become extinct.
Endangered wolves, on the other hand, wolfaboos did not ruin. Arabian, Mexican, Iberian, Ethiopian and the likes need help via protection and conservation, not hate because of wolfaboos.
tl;dr
I like wolves, and support population control of greys and conservation/protection of endangered wolves. But wolfaboos are starting to kill greys for me, and need to know there are many more animals out there in need of protection/saving than the grey.
Zarago wrote:Actually, to a wolf, humans are their most formidable enemy. They will run away from a human until there is no longer any proof of them being close by, and yet they are less afraid of bears, a much stronger and more aggressive predator. As I said, wolves do not know the difference between a person who is out to get them or out to save them, they are all the same to a wolf.
You're completely missing my point. Wolves simply rely on instinct to tell them 'it is a predator, it needs to be avoided'. And yes, they are all the same to a wolf: a predator that needs to be avoided.Thankfully, stealing animals from the wild and selling them to places like zoos is banned in most countries, but it still does happen, mostly illegally. I am not saying that it happens all the time, I was just pointing out to Annabeth101 how stressed and upset those animals would be. I have been to many zoos, and there is often just a pane of glass between the animals and the guests. This glass doesn't seem to affect most of the animals, they learn to ignore the screaming, but if it was a wild-born animal, can you imagine the stress that it would be going through? I've seen hand-raised tigers pacing up and down because of children yelling and screaming whenever it moved.
People very rarely 'steal' animals from the wild and sell them to zoos. Usually, a zoo gets a wild animal if it needed to be relocated or was saved from a poacher's trap. Again transfers from wild to zoo is uncommon. Zookeepers aren't idiots, they know if an animal is stressed and might transfer it to a wildlife preserve or simply give it stress relief medication. Again, most are zoo-born so this doesn't happen very often.If a wild wolf were to be introduced into a zoo (say to recover from an injury or just for the seller to gain some money from it) the worst thing for it would be to be kept in a restricted area surrounded by people which it had learnt to fear. It would be torture until the wolf would of found a place where it feels safer than other places. You can never fully tame a wild animal, and being stared and pointed at is not a way to start.
Cool Blue47 wrote:Think like they would=think from natural instinct.
It's my opinion; don't like it; deal with it bro. I am respectfully showing you holes in your way of thinking. I'm not always right, neither are you. I like civil debates where both sides debate respectfully.
You know, that is what everyone says when they start arguing with me on these sorts of topics. It's things like "deal with it" or "get over it", and it is very immature. To me, I have no holes in my way of thinking, because it's my opinion and I'm satisfied with it.
Nobody thinks they are wrong, because they think their opinion is always right. I'm mostly using facts, and my opinion is from what I've experienced and seen. Saying 'deal with it, bro' [i]is immature, which is why I said it; it was sarcasm. Apparently you have never heard of trollface. If that's the case, pardon the joke.I know you said "greys", but I said North American Grey wolves because that is the wolf that most "wolfaboos" think about when they start their immature and annoying conversations.[/i]
Flareon wrote:Wolves in general? Or grey wolves?
Greys used to be my favorite animal, until I met wolfaboos. It may sound mean and unfair to wolves, but, sorry that's just how it happened. I am (still) a wolf lover whom supports regulated hunting, conservation through zoos/parks, and etc of grey wolves. But it gets tiring being told why wolves are SO much better than every other animal on Earth. Do I still like greys? Yes. Do they need help: No, put your efforts on animals who are going to become extinct.
Endangered wolves, on the other hand, wolfaboos did not ruin. Arabian, Mexican, Iberian, Ethiopian and the likes need help via protection and conservation, not hate because of wolfaboos.
tl;dr
I like wolves, and support population control of greys and conservation/protection of endangered wolves. But wolfaboos are starting to kill greys for me, and need to know there are many more animals out there in need of protection/saving than the grey.
I do not support the hunting of wolves, even if it is just for population reasons. Killing an animal to maintain populations is like people culling people to maintain populations. Just because an animal is not as clever as we are, and cannot speak like the way we do doesn't give us the right to cull it. That is the way I view it.
if we didn't have regulated hunting to keep the population in check their numbers would explode, then die out from a slow death of starvation or disease. Then that would happen to the elk and so on. Wolves do not equal people. We don't kill an animal 'just because it's not as clever as us', we kill it for defense, population control, food, or the unfortunate black market trade. Regulated hunting kills with a swift bullet to the head that kills before the brain can even register pain, and also only affects about 15%, where 25% to even make a dent in the greys' numbers at all.And, I'm sorry that the idiocy of "wolfaboos" have ruined the Grey Wolf, but no matter what they say about this magnificent animal to make people not like it because of it's popularity among these people, I will never stop trying to protect all the varieties.
tigerwolf wrote:I've loved wolves since long before I found out how popular wolf-lovers are on the Internet. I still love them even though it makes me feel like I'm blending in with the crowd and doing what everyone else is doing, and I don't like that feeling. Either way, I love dogs and wolves in a way that is unexplainable. Not because it's "cool" to like wolves, but becuase I can relate to their way of life, instincts, and energy.
kuroyami wrote:opinion, i find a lot of wolf fans/lovers do not know much about them. they are casual fans. not Lupologists. or what ever a wolf scientist is called.
Howling-Wolf wrote:Back on FooPets some dude called iPlayfools loved something then the next day everyone else was loved it, it bugs me. And like on the thing Vampy did on Pirates vs Ninjas. Everyone liked pirates simply because Vampy did.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests