Remove "Special Release" from counting towards collection

[ElementalInsanity]

Full support, especially now with UR items.

[oniaano]

support :-D

[Stray Stranger]

Support, at the end of the day, most games with achievements have multiple achievements you can get, why not have various easier to complete collection challenges trackable? Like all rats from x year? Honestly just add a bunch of smaller collection goal achievements overall. All deer from x litter ect. Not sure how coherent I'm being sorry, I just think it would actually be really nice to track and get little checkmarks for several degrees of difficulty. Have easy to obtain checkmarks, mid difficult to obtain checkmarks, hard to obtain checkmarks, and hellishly difficult to obtain checkmarks for having every UR + every store pet. No reason to just not have an achievement list for each account. Might take some time to implement but shouldn't be too difficult and would be very nice for the kids playing this game casually.

[huskyhiccups]

bump!

[Metax]

Supporting this. c:

[ferretjuice]

I would really like this, as my goals are to collect all pets from 2011-2016 without stores and special release.
I like that stores aren’t counted already but I’d like an option where you could be ‘complete’ without UR pets.
Even if it was a box you tick or untick ‘count special release’

[huskyhiccups]

Bump

[Sashtato]

I support this, for one very specific reason.

I have collected EVERY single butterflywolf in the game except two. Wanna take a guess which? The UR BEE and UR PEACH! Those are not butterfly wolves at all, BUT because they use the caterpillar lines that makes them count which awakens a rage deep inside me that I cannot express. I have every single butterfly wolf, because I do, but the game thinks a peach and a bee are butterfly wolves and since they're UR pets with extremely high demand I'll probably never get them, and according to the game I will never have a full butterfly wolf collection. Its really disheartening and since then I've had to be careful which species I try to collect next (ones w/out URs so that I don't get that huge amount of disappointment again).

I worked EXTREMELY hard and spent a LOT of real life money to make it happen, but it still shows I don't have them, it makes me super sad. It also does things to my autistic brain. It doesn't make sense to me why its like that and its super confusing and frustrating for me.

**Edit

I saw someone mention a toggle option and I think thats a great idea! OR maybe different achievements/messages. Like "you have collected every normal pet from xxxx year" then save the message we have now for those who ALSO have URs. Something like that? Some sort of level or tier system.

[Neeko nordestina]

I wish there were different levels of completion
Completed all monthly pets? You get a checkmark
Completed all monthly pets + special releases? You get a star
Completed all monthly pets + special releases + store pets? You get a rainbow star

This way everyone could get the "I achieved something" feeling but there would still be harders things to achieve

[beautifulglitter]

I wish there were different levels of completion
Completed all monthly pets? You get a checkmark
Completed all monthly pets + special releases? You get a star
Completed all monthly pets + special releases + store pets? You get a rainbow star

This way everyone could get the "I achieved something" feeling but there would still be harders things to achieve

This would be amazing!

Personally, I like the checks because it lets me quickly take stock of my collection. Is year X not complete because I missed a monthly/accidentally traded it away or because I'm missing URs? Imo being forced to count URs towards a complete collection renders the entire point of the feature- convenience- completely useless, because I still have to click each year one by one to see what's going on.