Solloby wrote:I was hoping the special notes could link to existing guides rather than repeat explanations, but I didn't go through looking for them to check that such guides exist.
I like the idea of linking to different guides, but I also like the idea of keeping all of the important information in one guide. I know a huge turnoff for a lot of people in trading is having to cross-reference multiple guides for terminology and such. So if we just had a "terminology" section under the main section of the post, we could make it so people don't have to have multiple tabs open/click on multiple threads to find all of the information they need. I definitely
want to link those threads, but I don't want people to have to go there to get the information if you know what I mean? I think having a sectioned off "Terminology" spot can make it so people who already know the terminology can skip it, and people who need help with it don't have to click another guide.
Solloby wrote: Recreated pets are just important to check their date so you get their age right for trading. I've never heard them trading for any different value. There are so few around as Musicgurl says. I only mentioned them because they go into the same category as rereleases and extended releases as needing to look up their correct release date. I don't think true dates trade for differnet values much if the pet is VR or below. That's more of a 2008 thing?
Recreated pets actually have their original
dates on them, but they have an ID that makes them sit with newer pets alongside the time they were recreated. I personally value them similarly to pets with Cool IDs. (Again, personal valuation from someone who likes weird/cool IDs on their pets)
Ex: I sent a one-sided trade to an ID Collector who gave me
50 C$ for an OMGSC pet with ID 358900000 (Googly Eyes value not included, I asked them to put the googly eyes on it)
I also traded a 2010 Rare for
Sam who's ID is
169696969For an example of a Recreated pet,
This one says "2010-01-20", but sits among pets from 2021 (if you look lower in the group, you can see a pet from 2019, they have a few other recreated pets with 2021/2020 IDs, and it seems like a few litters/pets were recreated around that time so skipping forward/back a few IDs in the search bar won't get you anywhere but to other recreated pets in that timeframe.)
So there's definitely a trading market for "Cool ID" pets, but it's just not as well-known as the market for "Low ID" pets. It's not an uncommon practice for websites with Pet/Adoptable/Whatever IDs for people to be after a low or cool number. Flight Rising has a market for it, too.
It's rather niche, so it probably isn't as important as other trades.. On top of that, pets with weird/cool IDs probably don't have any particular value to people who don't pay attention to their pet IDs, so they don't really have "inherit" extra value to everyone, but there are collectors out there.
I'd say that as a baseline, collectors are willing to overpay for pets with cool IDs, so it might be beneficial for you(/general) to check your pet's ID if it looks like someone is overpaying by what would be a lot for that pet, for seemingly no reason. You might be able to get them to offer more if you acknowledge your pet's cool ID in the trade.
Solloby wrote:I've encountered far more rat collectors out there than spider collectors. Of the spider collectors I've spoken with, a few have acquired the rarest spiders by trading rats (e.g.
my own trade). So if we have to mention that poor little rats are low demand, I figured spiders would have to go in with them. I don't think we can really make statements about the demand of other species outside of the lions and dragons being high demand. For the rest of the linearts they are so personal and individual.
For example, I would not consider horses low demand, I always thought them more popular than ponies. A lot of people said Tess Horse was low demand but people who actually trade them out have found they trade easily and I see people wanting them, so It think it's just a myth and they are actually quite liked. Bunnies are adorable, I would not call them low demand. I don't think dwarf hamsters are high demand, and I personally do not rate the old guinea pigs at all. They used to be low demand, but I have seen someone recently call one high demand, so that was a bit confusing. I think the community can be a bit fickle about linearts at times.
That trade is kinda nuts imo! I didn't know people would swap spiders for rats 1:1. I haven't really spoken with many spider collectors, but I love a lot of the spiders on the site. They're some of my favorite linearts. (I also really love B-Wolves but I know they're controversial too!) and, as mentioned before, I typically get fair trades for spiders? I'd 1:1 a spider with a dog. I just thought they were like, medium-high demand outside of the people with phobias who don't want them.
I was just putting my own two cents in based on what I've heard around, how I've traded in the past, etc. I definitely don't think that my hastily thrown-together chart should be the baseline for demand or anything.
I personally only really like the PPS Horse Lineart, or the "cool" horses. Maybe they're just average demand? Most horses are just kind of.. boring, and look like real horses. Even in 2023 they haven't run out of "This is a normal horse" designs, they did a litter of 'em in January. I also personally don't think that the horse lines really.. "Fit" with the rest of the CS Style.
I like Tess Horses better than regular horses (and regular horses better than ponies).
The bunnies are cute and I find them like.. low to middling. I don't think the problem is that they aren't cute, I think the problem is that their lineart is weird. I don't like the leg that they have sticking up, or their eyes.
This pet:

Is actually my favorite bunny on the site. I think I'd like bunnies more as a whole if their legs were put down, their ears were larger, and they had an open eye like that.
The regular horses just look too realistic. I made a point in another thread, that all of the pets with the most demand tend to be the ones that have enough 'human-like' features to make them likeable, but not too many human-like features to make them creepy or uncanny.
Example: Dogs and Lions don't have realistic animal faces, their eyes make them expressive, and make them look "human enough". Monkeys have human-like eyes and expressions, but it makes them creepy, because they're monkeys. They're
too human and it becomes uncanny. The rats and horses suffer the opposite fate. Their eyes are small and beady. Not human enough. Not "cute enough". Humans seek out personification in things. The things we like the best resemble us, but not too much. It's why people name their plants or inanimate objects, draw animals with human-like eyes and expressions, or see faces in trees and cars. It's familiar, and familiar is comforting. Familiar is human-like. Human-like is cute, and good, and the "most attractive" quality you can put on anything non-human.
But when something that
isn't human becomes "too human", it's wrong. "Uncanny valley". It's why some dolls are creepy. (Which is a different threshold for everyone)
Anyway.
I like the scenery on a lot of the horses, it's just not what I collect pets for so I'm not too interested in them.
As for Dwarf Hamsters, I thought they were really popular? They have the "PPS" Look to them- all of them. And most of them have super cute or creative designs where they turn into objects or are ghosts or get turned into s'mores or flowers or whatever. I know the Hedgehogs and the "mice holding x" (flowers, pride flags, whatever) linearts are also both based off of them.
As for the guinea pigs, most of the 2010 VR/ER Guinea pigs go for like.. 80-100 C$? Sometimes more. The bunny ear hat one goes for a MA. So they definitely have demand.
Here"Bunny Ears Guinea Pig: 1 MA so 300c$~, but I sold mine for 600."
"The Blushing Clover Pig is considered a regular 2010 Very Rare by the rarity guides which is typically 30 to 45 c$ However the old lineart guinea pigs still have demand! I could see it going for 100 c$ to the right collector. Other 2010 Very Rare guinea pigs have sold for 100 - 115 c$ so I don't see why not."
Plus
This insane valuation of 0.25-0.5n for a Bunny Ears Guinea Pig.
FTT Advice "Bunny Ears Guinea Pig is worth 1-1.5 MA"
Past Guinea C$ SalesI will mention, there are also quite a few trades that value them at a regular 2010 R/VR/etc for whatever their rarity was at the time. So it does seem like the community is split on whether they have high demand or not.
Solloby wrote:
I don't think we should ask people which species they think are popular. But we could ask them which species they like most. I don't think people think the cat lineart is popular but it's my favourite on the site. But maybe I'm wrong, maybe a lot of other people like them a lot too. I don't think Google forms has a quiz type where you rate things in order though? That's what we really need, for people to rate the linearts from most to least favourite. I suppose we could do a single question survey where it's the grid and you rate each lineart from 1-5 or 1-10. A thread poll would be better but we'd be here until 2025 going through each lineart individually.
kee; wrote:I think a way to rate different species is a great idea since it really does vary a lot by person. I, for example, love the butterfly wolves, they’re my absolute favorite, but they tend to get stuck with a “low demand” label. I think this is pretty similar for the bunnies too, as Solloby mentioned.
so maybe having a poll/quiz for users to rank/order the species would show that some species might actually be more liked than their “bad demand” labels warrant.
-kee
This ^ I'd love a 1-10 (gives a bigger range) for specific pet Linearts. Maybe we should make a separate thread similar to the OMGSR Popularity Poll and call it the "CS Lineart Popularity Poll" so that there's a specific thread for it. That way we can cultivate discussion around that specific topic, since it seems to be a little out of our current range of discussion, since we're trying to not factor demand into our C$ charts.