✧ Zephyrus wrote:conarcoin wrote:asta, wrote:> all of cs atm: "oh no... our rarity system... it's broken..."
> ahem, anyways, in all seriousness i don't care for this update. i feel like every
single pet has been either overvalued, or undervalued, and that the list system
that we were all used to using has been completely disregarded.. the market is
completely flooded with omgsrs now and pets that actually had value before? i
can't see them being traded for fairly anymore. it's ridiculous.
> i'm calling it now: the rarity system will be reworked again in a month's time.
this way is just too severely broken.
i disagree, this shows to me that our OLD system was extremely broken. we now have more accurate depictions of the rarities of these pets, many of which were seriously undervalued for years.
this, big time. not to mention the list was discontinued four years ago, and was never really a tangible point of rarity in the first place IMO. i always felt like it was just created for certain people to have a sense of superiority, not to make trading easier or more accessible for everyone.
- op was talking about horror's list, the one horror spent forever on that was fair
to everyone involved. not the one used by certain people to have an advantage
over others. in the case of horror's list op is completely correct, market is flooded
and the pricing is completely up in the air.
as far as omgsr goes, what about the ones that were already valuable enough to
be considered omgsr?? should they not then have their own tier now?? saturation
of rarity has meant that valuable pets no longer have value at all and pets have
a comparable rarity now to things they used to never be in the same category as
before. make it make sense or don't make it at all.