Logia wrote:No support. I think people would just ask others to trade them a pet and immediately trade back, just to say that they've "owned" it. Makes the concept pretty meaningless.
Another World wrote:Logia wrote:No support. I think people would just ask others to trade them a pet and immediately trade back, just to say that they've "owned" it. Makes the concept pretty meaningless.
but the other user still has to agree to trade back so surely this isn't an issue?
Logia wrote:Another World wrote:Logia wrote:No support. I think people would just ask others to trade them a pet and immediately trade back, just to say that they've "owned" it. Makes the concept pretty meaningless.
but the other user still has to agree to trade back so surely this isn't an issue?
There would start being threads like "let's do a trade / trade back and I'll pay you 20 C$ for the Petdex check"
HEXORCISM wrote:hmm,, semi-support. i think for rares and up, or very rares and up, itd be a great idea. i think thatd be a nice balance between 'pets so hard to trade for theres no hope for a complete collection' and 'everyone swapping pets to fill it out in a week.'
might be also possible to require people to keep the pet for a certain amount of time, to prevent quick swapping. i think thatd be the kind of completionism challenge id be willing to go for: collecting all the uncommons and below myself, and then just swapping for anything rarer to check them off as "collected." and if i got a stamp or smth out of it thatd also be really cool.
the only real issue i think i can see is scams. someone promising to trade the pet back after and then it never happens. and then the new owner got the pet at a significantly lower value than its worth.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest