Chicken Smoothie History

[Lex.]

This was fun to read! I wish there were more things now like there were in the past <33

[gravy]

User made name generator

Users were allowed to submit name suggestions for a new name generator feature. Some found today are still suggested by old users!
(18th February 2014)
“Thanks for all your suggestions for pet names over the last couple of days! We've now added a pet name generator that you can use to name your pets, you'll find it on the "rename pet" page and on the "adopt a pet" page.

You can now rename a whole page of your pets at once, click on the "rename pets mode" button in your pet group to begin editing! There's a random name generator in that mode too.”

[gravy]

Hello! Could someone help me out by posting the photo mentioned as an image that will show up on CS?
I’m looking to get the “Halloween Giveaway! Click to enter the draw” stamp at the bottom of the page as an image link on CS so I can use it in my thread but am having trouble

I’ll send a gift to the first person to help:)

Link: https://web.archive.org/web/20121028063 ... halloween/

[Audrey_Bee]

The history is really cool..but I had to stop reading at the rarity update in 2019. I would be my ENTIRE life savings that it wasn't 2019. Right? I started in 2014 and I remember there being omgsr and omgsc because I remember wanting an omgsr REALLY badly... right? I refuse to believe it was as late as 2019

[gravy]

The history is really cool..but I had to stop reading at the rarity update in 2019. I would be my ENTIRE life savings that it wasn't 2019. Right? I started in 2014 and I remember there being omgsr and omgsc because I remember wanting an omgsr REALLY badly... right? I refuse to believe it was as late as 2019

Not sure what to tell you currently, I’ll look into this. thank you for the help!



Link to post made by Tess:
Forum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=4014755&hilit=overhaul+rarity

OMGSR could have existed before. I’ll try my best to work that out, and I’ll edit it ASAP


Edit:

Love this update, so many of my pound pets and stuff turned rare. Plus it makes things a lot easier!! Thank you to everyone who helped put this together! <3

Did anyone else notice the coontail went back to OMGSR?

Question: So what you guys did was adjust the threshold numbers, right? e.g. lowered the threshold for OMGSR so that more pets are considered as such, raised the threshold for VC so that more pets are considered OMGSC, etc

You are correct thank you!

[gravy]

Hello! Could someone help me out by posting the photo mentioned as an image that will show up on CS?
I’m looking to get the “Halloween Giveaway! Click to enter the draw” stamp at the bottom of the page as an image link on CS so I can use it in my thread but am having trouble

I’ll send a gift to the first person to help:)

Link: https://web.archive.org/web/20121028063 ... halloween/

Still looking for some help posting the photo:)

[Latibule]

Do you mean like this?

Link : https://web.archive.org/web/20121216003 ... &bg=d9d0db

[gravy]

Do you mean like this?

Link : https://web.archive.org/web/20121216003 ... &bg=d9d0db

Yep! The link wouldn’t post for me,

Thank you so much:) I’ll send over a gift right now

[Audrey_Bee]

NyanCatAndHelloKitty wrote:
I'm confused, haven't we had this rarity system for a while now?

I was wondering this too


The system's numbers got tweaked to better display the pets' actual rarities vs active accounts. I don't know what the numbers were before but here's an example of how they could have changed

Before the update the rarity threshold could have been
very common - 1 for every 100 accounts
common - 1 for every 400 accounts
uncommon - 1 for every 1000 accounts
rare - 1 for every 4000 accounts

After the update the threshold could now be
very common - 1 for every 400 accounts
common - 1 for every 1500 accounts
uncommon - 1 for every 3000 accounts
rare - 1 for every 5000 accounts

This would explain why so many uncommons dropped to common or very common if before they had been in the 1000-2000 range. With the second list a 1 in 1000 would now be in the very common tier rather than the "low" uncommon it would have been before. Again these are numbers I just pulled out of thin air

^^^^
Just a little thing about the rarity update, doing some research on that page, I see that it says the pets are *better* spread over the rarity tags.

I do remember the colour of the very common tag changing or if the very common tag was new.
But I think this post in particular in 2019 was more of a rarity update as explained by a user above.
I'll do some more research into this update for you!<3

[gravy]

NyanCatAndHelloKitty wrote:
I'm confused, haven't we had this rarity system for a while now?

I was wondering this too


The system's numbers got tweaked to better display the pets' actual rarities vs active accounts. I don't know what the numbers were before but here's an example of how they could have changed

Before the update the rarity threshold could have been
very common - 1 for every 100 accounts
common - 1 for every 400 accounts
uncommon - 1 for every 1000 accounts
rare - 1 for every 4000 accounts

After the update the threshold could now be
very common - 1 for every 400 accounts
common - 1 for every 1500 accounts
uncommon - 1 for every 3000 accounts
rare - 1 for every 5000 accounts

This would explain why so many uncommons dropped to common or very common if before they had been in the 1000-2000 range. With the second list a 1 in 1000 would now be in the very common tier rather than the "low" uncommon it would have been before. Again these are numbers I just pulled out of thin air

^^^^
Just a little thing about the rarity update, doing some research on that page, I see that it says the pets are *better* spread over the rarity tags.

I do remember the colour of the very common tag changing or if the very common tag was new.
But I think this post in particular in 2019 was more of a rarity update as explained by a user above.
I'll do some more research into this update for you!<3

Currently updating the CS history thread. Thank you for helping out