I prefer putting intent in parentheses rather than using tone indicators. they are clearer and more helpful in my experience, and part of that is because, as others have mentioned, there is no "standard" meaning for tone indicators. /gen could be "genuine" or "general", /s and /srs are not always clearly divided, and there a few i just could not figure out what they meant. There's more clarity in (genuine question), (half-joking), (just kidding), (I'm being serious), for me than /gen, /hj, /jk, /srs.
My experience is likely influenced by the fact that i mostly see them used in jokes. Or when they are used where i wouldnt expect to need a tone indicator - for example in a post/message that is dealing with a serious topic, where i would need an indicator to tell that the person is joking and not that they're being serious. "I hate war /srs", like, yes, i would expect you to be serious! why would someone assume youre joking?
Squecca wrote:I interpret them as patronizing [...]
that's where the interpretation of tone indicators being patronizing could come from. When you (general you) don't need them, it could feel like being talked down to. In the same vein that tutorials are sometimes interpretes as patronizing, because they tell you something you already know - while for others they can be useful.
I think this "overuse" or "misuse" somewhat soured me on them. Overall, though, I think it's helpful to add clarifications where you may be unsure c: because that's the thing with both parentheses and tone indicators - you, the person making a post/sending a text, have to assume how the recipient will interpret what you say and "counteract" wrong interpretations. They are
your tools, not the recipient's.
And i know the struggle, as someone who uses sarcasm or makes flat jokes a lot ^^'