The "Is this a fair trade?" Thread

[selfish ghost]

trades/viewtrade.php?id=103158304&userid=816127&signature=uZnNip9lQdP2e1Ztigf1BQ

hows this? i've been holding this trade off for a few days now o-O

[bittybun]

trades/viewtrade.php?id=103196282&userid=673108&signature=rg6OQfa1xbVQ9I4MHhjcTA
Ornament PPS (1 MA) for 300c$

trades/viewtrade.php?id=103196284&userid=673108&signature=powCWigpWtkP0-AFUuC_XA
UR Hollydog (2 non) + Earth and Mountain Lion (2 ma?) + Store Tiger (1 ma?) for UR Dragon

Thanks for the help!

[Skull.Vincent]

Agreeing with Animall on this one. (Also, your post started with "Both sell for the same amount of C$." Insuniating the subject you are talking about and how you are determining worth is through C$ trades.)

Even in your post you state the set is going for 0.5 non, which I'm guessing you got from here. Even in that trade tho, they say "5.5 MAs" bc all the other store deer besides the one on this subject are worth 1 MA. The deer being discussed is and has gone from 1.5 MA. There is additionally evidence supporting this in that link. (Also, this happened within the last month or so, not last christmas)

Additionally, the kitsune store pets are being shown to trade for 2 MAs, according to the same evidence of actual successful trades. (here).

In C$ terms, C$ is often used as overpay for pets (like Animall said) so it's inaccurate to solely rely on C$ value for pets.

Technically, you could value your pet at whatever you want and solely your experience with pets. However, that doesnt mean people will pay it. There is evidence to show what pets are actually being traded for across multiple accounts, which is what is cited above.

[da,]

Seconding animall as well. The trade simply was not fair to the kitsune, no matter how you look at it, by date, base value, and demand.

-snip-

the rainbow deer is 2/3 ma and kitsun is currently 2ma

this is simply not true. animall linked proof that this statement is inaccurate and that the deer is 1.5 MA and the kitsune is min. 2 MA. please do not spread misinformation

[sky,]

-snip-

Agreeing with Animall on this one. (Also, your post started with "Both sell for the same amount of C$." Insuniating the subject you are talking about and how you are determining worth is through C$ trades.)

Even in your post you state the set is going for 0.5 non, which I'm guessing you got from here. Even in that trade tho, they say "5.5 MAs" bc all the other store deer besides the one on this subject are worth 1 MA. The deer being discussed is and has gone from 1.5 MA. There is additionally evidence supporting this in that link. (Also, this happened within the last month or so, not last christmas)

Additionally, the kitsune store pets are being shown to trade for 2 MAs, according to the same evidence of actual successful trades. (here).

In C$ terms, C$ is often used as overpay for pets (like Animall said) so it's inaccurate to solely rely on C$ value for pets.

Technically, you could value your pet at whatever you want and solely your experience with pets. However, that doesnt mean people will pay it. There is evidence to show what pets are actually being traded for across multiple accounts, which is what is cited above.

I second and third both Animall and Skull.Vincent

Unfortunately C$ is a whole different market. As much as I wish it wasn't.
Storepets seem to be their own market within themselves.

Regardless, I have seen the Kitsunes going for 800-1000CS fairly recently. If it was based on C$ values, technically
it would be unfair by 2-3MA. Therefore, for more "accurate" values in worth, it makes more sense to base general
worth on pet values. People can value their pets however they want, but keeping this thread free of "well I value
1 MA as 2 MAs", is important because it defeats the purpose of a fair trade thread. (I know this wasn't necessarily
said but it correlates to the "why's").

But I agree that that trade was unfair, but not appallingly unfair. If they were to add 2-3 09's it would've been
absolutely perfect. But it really depends on the traders at the end of the day. c:

[bittybun]

https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=103196282&userid=673108&signature=rg6OQfa1xbVQ9I4MHhjcTA
Ornament PPS (1 MA) for 300c$

trades/viewtrade.php?id=103196284&userid=673108&signature=powCWigpWtkP0-AFUuC_XA
UR Hollydog (2 non) + Earth and Mountain Lion (2 ma?) + Store Tiger (1 ma?) for UR Dragon

Thanks for the help!

;33

[Halfmask]

Hey guys is this fair?

trades/viewtrade.php?id=103175177&userid=315823&signature=c2hkUc89X3583MpV7nRRvA

[sky,]

Hey guys is this fair?

trades/viewtrade.php?id=103175177&userid=315823&signature=c2hkUc89X3583MpV7nRRvA

The UR galaxy cat is listed at 1.5 nons according to horrors list

The UR cucumber/pickle is 1 non (I have seen it go for .75 recently? Don't quote me on that)
The dark leopard is 1.5-2 MAs + 1 MA for the nick cake dog = 2.5-3 MAs

My opinion is that this trade is unfair to you by roughly .25 nons or 3-4ish MAs

But get a second opinion on the demand portion c:

[Drive Like Jehu]

is this fair?

trades/viewtrade.php?id=103197481&userid=968286&signature=fPpBjJdEnAGFz_0PeKyp1w

[Caraxes]

trades/viewtrade.php?id=103197487&userid=209623&signature=_P1a9JxGFYfPMU4GDSCPLA

any thoughts?