joop wrote:joop wrote:regular; wrote:https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=98551925&userid=714665&signature=w0xXHz83FvtjY6wSgNoNbw
looking for some help with this one ^^
bumping as trading partner
up

ferretjuice wrote:ferretjuice wrote:
trades/viewtrade.php?id=98572023&userid=327768&signature=R8ty43eJTrAp4hIZ6q3bQA
is this trade good? <3
Rbpuppy wrote:Rbpuppy wrote:Rbpuppy wrote:Thoughts? Last time I checked a 2016 store was going for a 2009 rare but I’m not sure what that translates to on C$. Thanks!
trades/viewtrade.php?id=98536375&userid=42960&signature=w8GwNa6kNppIaS2DyRNS-Q

..(X).. wrote:I haven't been on CS for awhile I need help kinda ^^; trades/viewtrade.php?id=98566604&userid=695200&signature=a4APchI3zjrhJHn8gxeQ_A
..(X).. wrote:..(X).. wrote:I haven't been on CS for awhile I need help kinda ^^; trades/viewtrade.php?id=98566604&userid=695200&signature=a4APchI3zjrhJHn8gxeQ_A
would still like help on this thanks

Lucy34 wrote:..(X).. wrote:I haven't been on CS for awhile I need help kinda ^^; trades/viewtrade.php?id=98566604&userid=695200&signature=a4APchI3zjrhJHn8gxeQ_A
They’re offering:
2021 store pet valued at ~1 late '10 rare —> 0.5 late 2009 rare using 2:1 rule
2 early to mid 2010 rares —> 1 early to mid 2009 rare using 2:1 rule
Other pets don’t affect outcome
Total: ~1.5 ‘09 rares
Your side:
2017 store pet valued at ~1 mid '09 rare.
Fair by technicality, but I personally wouldn’t take it since the fennecs have good demand. (: None of the pets on their side have any particular demand in comparison.
Please get a second opinion too since everyone has a different perspective on demand.

Tomie found me wrote:https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=98574528&userid=813059&signature=8c6SjriQDUG575NSEeKXsw is this fair?


Silki wrote:https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=98574987&userid=481898&signature=KI1wCvDopZRlKoB4N_uqyg
havent been on in a while, is this fair?

Users browsing this forum: Antipathy, eldin_volcano, ivysnap, Lufi, Nicnova and 2 guests