The "Is this a fair trade?" Thread

[Demonking Urizen]

https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=95998868&userid=818213&signature=qeTk2dIBKnzKKlK6oiV-Jw

is this fairrr ?

unfair to them.
if you use the 3-month rule you are offering a mid 09 vr for 2 early 09 rares
not to mention that Nick horses usually don't have very good demand and the Aussies are highly sought

https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=95998909&userid=837254&signature=oRMZyNlHYReSKPGKw89Qzw

??

looks slightly unfair to you
the ur purple goes for 0.5n, their side adds up to 0.5 ma more than the higher end of 0.25n (4.5 ma)
honestly, considering the Tess horse is quite rarer (in rarity) than any of the pets offered on, I wouldn't lowballing it to 0.25n, even when people try to justify that with the demand.

[Osborn]

https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=95998868&userid=818213&signature=qeTk2dIBKnzKKlK6oiV-Jw

is this fairrr ?

Factoring in demand, the dogs on their side tend to have a lot of demand and can get slightly more than their worth which is the 3 month rule. These dogs can usually get more than the 3 month rule. Your side would be considered semi-fair if you didn't factor in the demand of their two dogs. I don't believe the Nick horse has any significant demand or value so this is overall unfair to them, ignoring the items which don't really affect the value of the trade.

[isl]

https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=95998868&userid=818213&signature=qeTk2dIBKnzKKlK6oiV-Jw

is this fairrr ?

unfair to them.
if you use the 3-month rule you are offering a mid 09 vr for 2 early 09 rares
not to mention that Nick horses usually don't have very good demand and the Aussies are highly sought

https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=95998909&userid=837254&signature=oRMZyNlHYReSKPGKw89Qzw

??

looks slightly unfair to you
the ur purple goes for 0.5n, their side adds up to 0.5 ma more than the higher end of 0.25n (4.5 ma)
honestly, considering the Tess horse is quite rarer (in rarity) than any of the pets offered on, I wouldn't lowballing it to 0.25n, even when people try to justify that with the demand.

thank you! what would they need to add to make it fair?

[piff]

https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=95998868&userid=818213&signature=qeTk2dIBKnzKKlK6oiV-Jw

is this fairrr ?

Factoring in demand, the dogs on their side tend to have a lot of demand and can get slightly more than their worth which is the 3 month rule. These dogs can usually get more than the 3 month rule. Your side would be considered semi-fair if you didn't factor in the demand of their two dogs. I don't believe the Nick horse has any significant demand or value so this is overall unfair to them, ignoring the items which don't really affect the value of the trade.

ty ! would it be fair to do one of the dogs for the vr ? or would i add something instead of one of them ?

[Guest]

this?

bumping as the trade partner

unfair to the Shima's side.
both the Shima and the Cheshire go for 2 ma each, so every other pet is not necessary.

Cheshire Cat is 2-3 ma. their side is just over 2 (shima is valued at 2 ma) however you could possibly push for 3 since the Cheshire Cat is quite sought after

i was told the cheshire was 2-2.5 MA

the only cases I saw the Cheshire getting 3 ma was when rats were offered
but in this case the demand of the pets is equal, because the Shima is just as high in demand as the Cheshire

(this screenshot is so big, im sorry)

godking, in the past you've said that cheshire most commonly gets 2-3 ma and now you seem to be changing what you've said. its difficult to say what cheshire is really worth as looking at the successful trades thread, it has been valued at 2 ma and even up to .25n numerous times. its really up to how the person with Cheshire values it, as in the end is it a unique looking store pet. a 2020 rerelease looks nowhere near appealing as the Cheshire (in my opinion)

[Geckos_N_Tea]

https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=95998868&userid=818213&signature=qeTk2dIBKnzKKlK6oiV-Jw

is this fairrr ?

Factoring in demand, the dogs on their side tend to have a lot of demand and can get slightly more than their worth which is the 3 month rule. These dogs can usually get more than the 3 month rule. Your side would be considered semi-fair if you didn't factor in the demand of their two dogs. I don't believe the Nick horse has any significant demand or value so this is overall unfair to them, ignoring the items which don't really affect the value of the trade.

ty ! would it be fair to do one of the dogs for the vr ? or would i add something instead of one of them ?

i personally wouldn’t value them that high, although i do know that demand for them is quite high. imo one of the dogs plus a ‘10 rare would be fair

[piff]

would it be fair to do

(VR 2009)

for the 2009 nick horse ?? ahhh brain go brrrr

[Demonking Urizen]

would it be fair to do

(VR 2009)

for the 2009 nick horse ?? ahhh brain go brrrr

still unfair, especially when you use the three-month rule.
the husky is an early 09 vr, the horse is a mid 09 vr

[Osborn]

would it be fair to do

(VR 2009)

for the 2009 nick horse ?? ahhh brain go brrrr

No, the dog is from February 2009 and is not from within 3 months of the Nick horse's release date, so it would be unfair to the dog. I don't believe the dog has any high demand so you might be able to trade the Nick horse for it if you added small.

[Leylard]

would this be fair?