
rekkovi wrote:Warning, tiny bit of ranting ahead! But it is mainly good things (:
-snip-
Durnehviir wrote:rekkovi wrote:Warning, tiny bit of ranting ahead! But it is mainly good things (:
-snip-
-snip-
rekkovi wrote:Durnehviir wrote:rekkovi wrote:Warning, tiny bit of ranting ahead! But it is mainly good things (:
-snip-
-snip-
-snip-
never forget
summer 2018
Targaryen wrote:-snip-
In other news... I brought this pretty girl home over a week ago.
never forget
summer 2018
Targaryen wrote:I do empathise with where you're coming from. In the past 5-6yrs especially, the hobby has pushed forward a LOT regarding care standards and that's great - truly. It's nice to see larger enclosures become the standard, and UVB for more crepuscular animals and snakes especially become more commonplace.
However there has sort of become this extremist group on this side of the husbandry spectrum who are very quick to denounce anything but the best as abusive. Heatmats? Abusive. No halogens? Abusive. No UVB for a leopard gecko or snake? Abusive. Not exactly a 4x2x2ft for a ball python or bearded dragon? Abusive.
It doesn't make sense and it ends up alienating more people than it helps. While we should always strive to do the most and the best we can as guardians of these animals, we all need to start somewhere and all animals are individuals and that should be accounted for. Some get smaller, some get bigger, some are more active, some are less active, some are disabled or sickly in some fashion and that needs to be accommodated. Sometimes that looks like practising husbandry that is less than, or not the best, but it is in fact in the best interest of the animal. You need to know the rules to learn how to break them, and sometimes not practicing these "minimums" put forward is actually in the best interest of the animal.
In other news... I brought this pretty girl home over a week ago.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 9 guests