Yibeullin wrote:hello everyone! i was wondering what i'd have to add to make this a fair trade? Valuing the BEG at 1.5 nons. And if someone could tell me how much c$ could be added to make this fair that'd be helpful too, but i'm fine with just pet value.
hopefully the link should work for y'all now?♡

































Faye_46 wrote:doliork wrote:I'm auctioning off 105 pages of items, and I'm debating between these two bids. Could someone please help me and tell me which is worth more? One has a lot of older rares, but the other has some store pets and I'm not sure how that balances out.
Bid 1 - 32 pets total - 1 2009 VR, 1 2009 R, 14 2010 R, 14 2011 R, 2 2012 R
Bid 2 - 17 pets total - 2 2009 R, 3 2010 R, 3 2011 R, 1 2014 R, 1 2016 R, 3 2020 R, 1 2018 store pet, 3 2020 store pets
Thanks!
From what I know, The bottom one is better. Very little people like Rats so their demand isn't good, so I suggest you do with the second bid




mdsnlei wrote:TRADE 1:
trades/viewtrade.php?id=89691325&userid=127913&signature=0zQenP_IvKcV-2hbYh5uSQ
TRADE 2:
trades/viewtrade.php?id=89693851&userid=127913&signature=5HCS-q8lVsl0oRc-UQOWVg
I dont think this posted the first time... guidance??













.png)


.png)







Aespin wrote:It looks unfair to me but I'm just checking in. Hoping to get an idea on how big or small of a worth difference there is between the two sides.
trades/viewtrade.php?id=89693977&userid=931117&signature=JOgEER86AQu51tOTEAWsOw
Inara Serra wrote:if you value rares as being worth 4 uncommons of the same years and follow the 2:1 ratio, this is unfair for you. your side is a 2013 rare, but the pps cat is only from 2015, and the uncommons don't quite equal a 2014 rare. for it to be fair, the other side would need to offer 4 2015 rares, or at least 5 more 2014 uncommons.



Spirited Away wrote:https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=89694052&userid=813435&signature=Gcj15XXmFJnr2IFM7wkoUA
should I accept?

Users browsing this forum: TANKMEN and 2 guests