Daisyfang Weirdo wrote: Please read this the whole way through before replying to me, thank you! This isn't in disagreement with the thread or any points made, only the title.
I'm rather confused as to why the most drastic (and possibly even the most aggressive sounding, although that's likely just my biased perception of it) suggestion is as the title? Perhaps it's just a way to get the attention of staff, but for the longest time it threw me off even looking at the thread because it seemed like some extreme thread for some disgruntled people with a grudge against the creators of cs. It sounds like a personal demand rather than a helpful thread on how to breathe life back in to the website we all enjoy. After looking through the posts and the (incredibly helpful, might I add) first page I can tell that this thread being aggressive or a personal grudge just isn't the case of the thread at all, but for the longest time that's how the title read in my mind and I'm wondering if it's creating a bias against the thread. Even now when I read it, everything seems more extreme or opinionated than I would typically perceive it, just because the title has such an extreme outlook and I immediately see it as more of a personal issue against the staff than I would were the title something less extreme/demanding like "saving chickensmoothie" or something like that. I feel like it creates an unnecessary bias against the thread for people who would likely agree if they actually read what was being said, but write it off because the title takes such an extreme and/or aggravating stance in some people's opinions.
If someone could give me a better explanation of why "sell chickensmoothie" is the name of thread other than just that the creator of the thread likes the option, I would really appreciate it since as I said I believe my outlook may still be biased and perhaps someone else's less biased explanation would help me understand better. I do wonder if it's only me who got an immediate bad taste in their mouth after reading the title, or if other people felt the same.
(And just to add, I have read the little "Why Is This Titled "Sell CS" section, but it just kind of reads as "this is the option I like the most so I put it as the title") I'm also not disagreeing with the thread, because the facts are there and I can't sit and deny that people are leaving and change is needing when you all bring such good suggestions, points and facts to the table. I just feel that the title is scaring people off and preventing them from taking the thread seriously enough to read all the good points that are made.Massive thanks to anyone who reads and helps me understand better. <3
the clockwork cat wrote:it is extreme yes, but other threads have been called "save CS/show us that you care" etc. and were all ignored, locked, or created arguments, so the extreme measure we felt was needed. The explanation on the front page, and many responses before about this, may further help you understand our reasoning for the title. c:
I second the clockwork cat in this. It is an aggressive title, but it's also a necessary one.
One of this thread's forerunners was Flatterina's
Show us that you care, which also has a Title with a capital T. It's goal was similar to this one: get a response (literally any response) from staff, because users felt they were being left behind. The difference is that it never got a response, partially because it didn't gather the momentum this thread had. The thread was eventually locked to prevent ranting, which was frustrating for the people involved because it kneecapped the thread. A thread that can't be posted in can't gather any support, and so there was virtually zero chance that the admins would see it, much less reply to it.
Lacuna, who locked the thread, explains the position the staff was in: "the threads were at that time devolving into ranting because we felt we could not give a response; we understand why people were frustrated, but we felt our hands were tied because the thing we were supposed to do was wait for a founder to reply."
The problem was that the thread
wasn't garnering enough attention or momentum to do two things: a) provide enough fresh voices to limit ranting amongst a few users, and b) get the attention of staff. This thread, however, has managed to do both of those things, and in my opinion that excuses a multitude of sins.
I don't mind that the title is almost clickbaity - I think that
in this one specific scenario that's a good thing, because (for the most part!) it encourages people to come onto the thread and post their opinions, which is necessary to keep the thread alive and well. The "extreme position" of the title forces users to think about where they stand in relation to that title, which sparks debate and an honest conversation about why a suggestion this extreme is even being considered. And that's the best part of this thread - that we're finally having this conversation.
This
is a hard topic and it
is an extreme suggestion, but the success of the thread speaks to the fact that a suggestion this extreme was needed. I personally don't think it causes people to be biased against the thread, since most people have come forth with their support and honest contributions (
and also i spent a while on that front page post so like i hope they get the point), up to and including staff and site admins. A massive shoutout to the mods and staff who have participated actively in the thread and made sure the atmosphere stayed positive <3
Edit: also, the second update post includes a link to another part of the thread where the title was under discussion that you may find interesting!
also also while i don't have an issue with the title the poll could be designed better, it's very binary right now