stanley barber. wrote:MeepMorpLazuli wrote:Thank you all for the advice on the other trades.
Am I overpaying by a lot with this trade and this one? Pretty sure I am rarity wise (and I know I definitely am for the second one), but what about demand?zodiacs trade for 2 2009 rares ea., so a full set would be worth 24 2009 rares.
your side has:
- 4 2009 vr = 8 2009 rares
- 3 2010 r = 1 2009 r + 2009 uc
- 6 2011 r & 2 2011 uc = 4 2009 r + 2 2009 uc + 2010 uc
- 4 2012 r = 2010 r or 2 2009 uc
- 2013 r = 2011 uc
- 40 c$ = roughly 2010 vr = 2009 r
total = 15 2009 rares + 2009 uc + 2010 uc + 2011 uc
(4 2009 uc = 2009 r so i've just added up corresponding values).
so your side has a little over 15 2009 rares worth. so demand-wise you are underpaying, but rarity-wise, yes, you are overpaying.
as for the second trade, again:
- 4 2009 vrs + 3 2009 r = 11 2009 rares
- 16 2010 r = 8 2009 r
- 11 2011 r = 2 2009 r + 3 2009 uc
- 3 2012 r = 3 2010 uc
- 3 2013 r = 3 2011 uc
- 2 2014 r
- 5 2016
- 2 2017
total = 21 2009 r + 3 2009 uc + 3 2010 uc + 3 2011 uc
could not for the life of me find the bw in the archive so i haven't factored it into the total, but this roughs out at 21 2009 rares + add. again, i haven't done 2014 onward because the space between those rares and 2009/2010/2011 uc get bigger and bigger and we would be getting into vc/omgsc conversions.
please get a second opinion in case i have gone wrong along the way, but from my understanding neither of these trades are fair in terms of demand. otherwise, drastic overpay on rarity terms.Ruruskadoo wrote:Fair?
trades/viewtrade.php?id=87527709&userid=119355&signature=5Dqw-H9-_bfLBKk2Ng9Wcg2015 rare = 2011 vc
you're overpaying. your side is worth a 2011 rare + add.
The blue BW rerelease is from 2008. Thank you for the breakdown though. Super helpful ♡
