The "Is this a fair trade?" Thread

[saint]

x
help on this?

[amarok.]

Would you guys take 3-non worth of these pets for Joker? I don't personally value their pets at the same they do and they aren't pets I am particularly interested in. Trade Here Their values =Pawprint rat between 1 sorb - 1 non, Zebra at 1.5 non, Joker bun at 1-1.5, Rudolf rat... no clue, Holly 1.5, Nonjewel 1.

Well 3 nons for any joker is ridiculously over
I would never, ever trade 3 nons for a joker or trade my joker for 3
If you don’t want their pets, I would just go ahead and decline instead of taking so much



Id personally agree at least partially with their values as well.

The rat ofc not a sorb to non

But holly 1-1.5
Zeb 1-1.5
Joker Bun only 1

not to be rude but that's utterly ridiculous. the joker is not hard to find. it's worth around a september list and i genuinely fail to see how one non, let alone 3 nons, is not enough. by all means, value your pets however you want, but if the person on the other side is reading this i strongly suggest you take your pets and go elsewhere. at the end of the day a "non" is a non, especially when the zebra in particular is so very valuable, and it's just not fair to expect that much from the other side.

x
help on this?

rarity wise it's probably about square, since the nonballoon and ur aussie are worth very roughly the same as far as we can tell, but demand wise the aussie consistently trades for a non whereas the nonballoon doesn't even necessarily fetch a full sorbet (I.e less than 0.5 nons) due to its poor list placement. the pets don't really cover the demand gap either and I don't necessarily think it's in your best interests.

[kököchin]

how's this?
drink me for td joker + ur butterbun + CEG

[SleepyKerfuffle]

trades/viewtrade.php?id=86460547&userid=900967&signature=WBvtWPypC83t1naOVOnT3A

I don't think this is fair demand-wise, but I wanted to make sure.

[loki laufeyson]

hello! wondering if these storepet trades are fair?
one
two
thank you in advance

[(^-^)]

trades/viewtrade.php?id=86460547&userid=900967&signature=WBvtWPypC83t1naOVOnT3A

I don't think this is fair demand-wise, but I wanted to make sure.

Hi I think you used the wrong link, you should use the one at the bottom of the page

[(^-^)]

hello! wondering if these storepet trades are fair?
one
two
thank you in advance

You can't see the second link

[loki laufeyson]

hello! wondering if these storepet trades are fair?
one
two
thank you in advance

You can't see the second link

oops sorry thanks for letting me know, i've fixed it

[amarok.]

hello! wondering if these storepet trades are fair?
one
two
thank you in advance

second link is wrong but the first one is overpay on their side. there's a bit of debate about whether a '20 should be valued at a late '10 or an early '11 but they're offering an early '10.

how's this?
drink me for td joker + ur butterbun + CEG

rarity wise, you're overpaying since the ur butterbun alone would be fair. demand wise, the drink me is going for 5-6 nons (apparently though it's now beginning to struggle to fetch that, which honestly was very inevitable, and similarly appears to be going a little out of fashion). the joker and ceg appear to be a little bit hit or miss demand wise I think, and personally I wouldn't value the joker any higher than its list placement but it commonly goes for 1-2 nons, the ur butterbun is a solid 1 non and the CEG goes for 1-1.5. that'd bring your side to 3-4.5 nons, probably towards the lower side, but it really depends on your trading partner. as such you'll likely need to add between 0.5-3 nons.

[loki laufeyson]

hello! this is the second one that wasn't working previously-