itsliza wrote:Sorry, what about this one?
trades/viewtrade.php?id=83910744&userid=772106&signature=I0eElwq7S_Rjq44GkfAzdA
Unfair to the other person c:
itsliza wrote:Sorry, what about this one?
trades/viewtrade.php?id=83910744&userid=772106&signature=I0eElwq7S_Rjq44GkfAzdA
weep wrote:could i have some advice with this trade?
i always value it c$ wise so would it be unfair to me?
MidnightDuchess wrote:
They are offering 3 09 rares worth + some uncommons and newer rares not mentioned because they don’t add up to much
Both of your dogs are worth 2 ‘09 rares and 1 ‘10 rare each as they are from Nov 2008. They need to add about 2 ‘09 rares to be fair rarity wise.
Personal opinion here: Demand wise you could get way more. (I personally demand value those dogs at 3-4 ‘09 rares each as that is what I personally would be willing to pay for them. Others may not, that so, demand is not set for them.)
weep wrote:could i have some advice with this trade?
i always value it c$ wise so would it be unfair to me?
SeaCrest wrote:weep wrote:could i have some advice with this trade?
i always value it c$ wise so would it be unfair to me?
Can't speak to C$ values as it's usually recommended that unless C$ is directly involved, you go with date and rarity, not C$ values. This adds up to just over 1.5 '15 rare on the bottom and a little over 8 '15 rares on the top, making it unfair to the top.
HennesseyCamaro wrote:How easy is UR holly to trade for 1.5 non value?
Users browsing this forum: Pinkapillar, TANKMEN and 12 guests