The "Is this a fair trade?" Thread

[Rbpuppy]

https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=83905744&userid=327768&signature=os3Vv_OLVS_-jHm39w1kWg
how is this trade? thank you!

Unfair to you, the moonswirl I’ve seen go for 3-4 Nons which is not what their side equates to. C:

[amarok.]

https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=83887619&userid=826487&signature=U0I584NqwOWMi2WFK1YlJA

Is this fair? I'm really unsure about the worth of items.

Unfair to you. I'd say just the oldest three of your pets are worth more than everything they're offering anyway by the 2:1 rule.

[♥Sterek♥]

Hi guys I'm having some trouble with this trade and am not sure if it's fair.. I have a hard time figuring out what the 2011 summer event items are worth

trades/viewtrade.php?id=83867179&userid=228725&signature=Q2xcc4SP1lyuaToJkZbKKg

Edit: also this trade?
trades/viewtrade.php?id=83894640&userid=228725&signature=0P4OFCOdrerViHU3kEhy3w

[/quote]

[amarok.]

Hi guys I'm having some trouble with this trade and am not sure if it's fair.. I have a hard time figuring out what the 2011 summer event items are worth

trades/viewtrade.php?id=83867179&userid=228725&signature=Q2xcc4SP1lyuaToJkZbKKg

Edit: also this trade?
trades/viewtrade.php?id=83894640&userid=228725&signature=0P4OFCOdrerViHU3kEhy3w

[/quote]
Your horsehair wig is worth a '11 uncommon, occasionally more, and worth more than everything they're offering alone. Very unfair to you.

I'd also personally judge the second trade as unfair to you purely due to the bulk of old and valuable items on your side.

[GreenteaLatte]

https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=83887619&userid=826487&signature=U0I584NqwOWMi2WFK1YlJA

Is this fair? I'm really unsure about the worth of items.

Unfair to you. I'd say just the oldest three of your pets are worth more than everything they're offering anyway by the 2:1 rule.

I'll have to disagree on that.

Top is worth = 1 2013 uncommon, 1 2013 common, 1 2014 common, 1 2015 common 1 2017 very common, 1 2019 very common and a 2016 item.
Bottom is worth= 1 2013 uncommon, 1 2014 common, 1 2015 common, 1 2016 very common, 1 2017 very common and 1 2018 common and 6 2016 items.

usually items are valued at around a common of the year it was released, and if you add them in, the value would be

Top = 1 2013 uncommon, 1 2013 common, 1 2014 common, 1 2015 common, 1 2017 very common and 1 2019 very common.
Bottom = 1 2013 uncommon, 3 2014 common, 1 2015 common, 1 2016 very common, 1 2017 very common and 1 2018 very common.

Yes it's unfair to the bottom. However, just three oldest pets alone won't be enough for the value of the top.

[saint]

help please!

[Rbpuppy]

help please!

Unfair to you, your pet is an 09

[ThunderCedar]

help please!

Unfair to you, your pet is an 09

I disagree.
New store pets are worth a late 10' rare each. There's 5 of them on the other side. That adds up to 2 09 rares and a half.
The trade should be about fair.

Both sides include popular pets so I don't think there's much to speak about in terms of demand.

[kitsuwn]

Is this a fair trade?

[Bruno Buccellati]

Would this be fair? >: