never wrote:LittleEcho wrote:Even then, it's gonna be tricky. It's like telling the whole world the color green doesn't exist. Some will go through. Some will still be following by the old rules.
I think you should get everyone together and attempt (I could make a discord for it) to have a discussion on everything we want to achieve.
Cause personally I think we should just revise the list and go by what others already follow (like red cerb at 4 nons and coontail at like 2) that kind of stuff.
can I just add that the cerb iv ehad an issue getting 4 nons for lol. it’s usually 3.5
never wrote:LittleEcho wrote:Even then, it's gonna be tricky. It's like telling the whole world the color green doesn't exist. Some will go through. Some will still be following by the old rules.
I think you should get everyone together and attempt (I could make a discord for it) to have a discussion on everything we want to achieve.
Cause personally I think we should just revise the list and go by what others already follow (like red cerb at 4 nons and coontail at like 2) that kind of stuff.
can I just add that the cerb iv ehad an issue getting 4 nons for lol. it’s usually 3-3.5
I think if we DO have a discord (I don’t find necessary) we should have cs staff.
But it’s just so easier to have a poll, give reason why we dd it ina. Post, and be done with it















LittleEcho wrote:In my opinion, We should have a list (a upgraded one to be more precise) cause people like me need ground floor, something to hold onto because I know that I know what a lot of people go by and I don't have to trade blindly. Like the old list it can be a "not everyone has to go by this (obviously) but most people generally go by it anyway, we're just confirming the placement if that makes sense.











Eatha wrote:question: are placements going to be the same as the old list? because if so what was the point of retiring the old list.
considering the old list was mainly just ''lol heres demand inflation'' and i'd hate for this to be another one of those*
Eatha wrote:question: are placements going to be the same as the old list? because if so what was the point of retiring the old list.
considering the old list was mainly just ''lol heres demand inflation'' and i'd hate for this to be another one of those*
Sh4rp wrote:Eatha wrote:question: are placements going to be the same as the old list? because if so what was the point of retiring the old list.
considering the old list was mainly just ''lol heres demand inflation'' and i'd hate for this to be another one of those*
The list wasn't the one which had demand inflation; it was mainly the people who had the pet and wanted to increase the value of the pet so they can get more out of it










Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests