DrMoneyBags wrote:Kittytalia wrote:DrMoneyBags wrote:Will you be placing Pets,like the dragoncat and Shima, which almost always trade for lists, on it?
And how will you tackle omgsr rats? They’re omgsr but rarely trade for even a sorb
Yes! The dragoncat and Shima will be placed right alongside the lists that they are of equal worth to, going by how many '09 rares they are worth compared with similarly valued lists. Certain non-lists from before will will be lists according to this one.
I am still considering how to do the rats. They are certainly not valued very high by most people, so there will likely be a poll to come later on, to get people's general opinion on whether they should be placed below, at or above a sorb's value. They should be placed around that area, but it depends on how the poll goes, and the opinions we see later c:
Will you be removing things like the grinners and lowlist non-stores that don’t really.. go for anything. Their only value comes from being on there, truthfully.
LittleEcho wrote:Okay so are you going to update the other list pets? Cause heaven knows the raven/patchwork don't belong in the place they are. Neither do the eat me/drink me. Also the UR Aussie rarely goes for a sorbet, even if it says it's a non + sorbet.
ajohanna wrote:
um, wasn't the rares list retired for a reason? so why in the world do we need a new one? it completely messes with the demand of pets. why would someone want to trade a main-list for an 09 staff litter rare just for demand? it's pretty idiotic if you ask me. all this does is lead to mayhem and completely unfair trades.
Koikee wrote:ajohanna wrote:
um, wasn't the rares list retired for a reason? so why in the world do we need a new one? it completely messes with the demand of pets. why would someone want to trade a main-list for an 09 staff litter rare just for demand? it's pretty idiotic if you ask me. all this does is lead to mayhem and completely unfair trades.
i agree with ajohanna. i don't think this is right to be adding a list based on demand. it'll be spiking the worth of certain pets even more and it is honestly not good for trading. and quoting, "why would someone want to trade a main-list for an 09 staff litter rare just for demand?", this is ridiculous. i don't think this thread should be continued as the former list was put down for a reason.
and i know the rarity of pets has changed, but that doesn't follow demand. pets should be going worth their actual rarity, not something that people look at and be like "oh, look at that pet i like it!".
Why did people want to retire the list? wrote:‘The Rares List’ has caused much controversy with trading. Everyone was forced to use it, no matter what their opinion was or guide they followed. ‘The Rares List’ was never an official guide, yet many users did not know this. The list has reached a point were it is too inaccurate and too confusing. New users had barely any chance of making it onto the list as well. It would’ve taken years to fix the list, so the best option was just to retire it and let new users make new guides for the community to follow.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests