- I'm excited to see how trading changes! I've never experienced CS without a list, so it'll be an interesting change.
DarkestWerewolf wrote:^ I feel you.
I’ve been aware the list wasn’t an official guide but I’ve been so used to the list and with it being retired. It feels like everything has been uprooted.
I currently have a handful of list pets up for trade and even one benign auctioned. I have trades coming in everyday for my lists but I don’t know how to judge them.
I wanna trade but I’m also worried and nervous to trade without being called a scammer. :’)
I don’t know why but since the list has retired, I’ve just been a ball of anxiety. I know I should feel free that i it might be easier to trade now but I don’t know why I’m still feeling this way. Ahhhh. Woe is me.
JJdiner wrote:sure they are wildly different, but comparing keeping the list and editing it vs keeping the list and redoing it, is a far closer comparison than keeping it and throwing it out. those two comparisons are worlds a part. have you seen the offers ive been getting? do you want those offers? cause all it does it make me not want to trade. all this "it makes me feel less stressed" is nonsense. it makes me more stressed and angry and almost want to rage quit to play a different game
BuddyMaltese wrote:A lot of those trades are unfair rarity wise, regardless of whatever artificially inflated value the Rares List gave them. Would I accept a handful of random rares for an OMGSR pet? Absolutely not. Would I accept a 2008 VR non-list pet for a pet of mine that was on the list at some point - perhaps even as high as the September list? I would actually, so long as the rarities and date match up, and so long as they both went VR at around the same time.
I might have worked hard for my list pets and paid a lot for them at some point, but I recognize the dissolution of the Rares List as a necessary step in mending the trading economy, and if I have to grin and bear a loss in profit so people in the future and new members have a better shot at trading and having fun, then so be it.
The Last Raven wrote:I fully agree with you Buddy. I am still trying to decide how to value things, but we have to remember that the values given by the list were completely user created and not actually a real reflection of then pet's rarity. A lot of pets that turned VR the same time as list pets were left off the list, so I would more than likely value them the same. The list retiring gives us the opportunity to trade more fairly and closer to the actual rarity and not go by 10k 09 rares = a sunjewel (which is ridiculous)
The Last Raven wrote:That wasn't what was being polled though. The discussion to create the poll took weeks and weeks and arguing and redoing and etc until these options were decided. It wasn't as simple as keep or end for a reason. Countless opinions were brought up until most people agreed on this poll. if you don't like those offers don't take them. Others might though and now they have the opportunity to discuss values with their partner until both parties are happy without people being labeled as scammers because they don't follow the false values set up by the list. I'm sorry this stressed you out and makes you angry, but this site when never really meant to revolve around something like this list in the first place. And actually your examples and reaction makes me even more believe that the list did more harm than good to the trading aspect of this game.
BuddyMaltese wrote:
I disagree that it is a closer comparison. Redoing the list to the point that it would need to be redone would just essentially be creating a new list reflecting rarity, something which is already being done through a few independent projects.
Users browsing this forum: betulacarelica, Sunabi and 6 guests